Stylin55_oh
CEG'er
And it is one of the ugliest timing covers I've seen!![]()
very good point!
And it is one of the ugliest timing covers I've seen!![]()
well that's definately an 01-03 block. or an early 04. that has the small upper ring land. that's what happens with boost and thin ring lands mang!
the marks in the top of the piston could be from the corners of the rings chipping off and managing to pass upward to the top of the piston and get hammered into the head and the piston.
it could be worse..... at least you were still able to find your piston
![]()
Not sure they meant the actual cooler but there is an ear that should be cut to let the lines have room. I didnt cut the ear on my 3L and my lines were dangerously close to the manifold.
Same piston & same location of failure... just a different KIND of failure.
So I have to ask again... are these the same injectors that were installed on your other engine that had a cylinder #5 piston failure?
The missing piston chunk is typical overboost stuff, as already mentioned. However, the craters in the piston look more to me like what would happen from cool fuel droplets on a hot piston. I suppose they could also be from molten pieces of piston-chunk... but they really don't look like impact marks to me.
What are you running now?i was running 24#s on the other.
Excessive PSI as related to your tune, and/or the threshold of your components... in this case the pistons. It could be overboost in general, (just too much for the pistons to take on a regular basis), in which, cylinder 5 just happened to be the one that failed both times, (though I'd call that a long shot at best). Not to say that the ring lands AREN'T sh*tty... but with the problem happening in the same place of the same cylinder or two different engines, it doesn't look to me like you can blame this entirely on the ring lands. It looks more to be isolated to that cylinder. As in, for some reason, (possibly due to your intake and/or cam configuration), that cylinder is seeing more boost than the others... expecting that fuel intake by the cylinders is equal per bank, (the cylinder looks like it was running lean as compared to the others, but that can happen from too much boost, just as easily as from too little fuel). Does the other bank tell a similar story, (middle cylinder leaner than the others)?and when u say overboost, u mean excessive psi? or just using it all the time? cuz it sits at 9psi now.
What are you running now?
42#s
Excessive PSI as related to your tune, and/or the threshold of your components... in this case the pistons. It could be overboost in general, (just too much for the pistons to take on a regular basis), in which, cylinder 5 just happened to be the one that failed both times, (though I'd call that a long shot at best). Not to say that the ring lands AREN'T sh*tty... but with the problem happening in the same place of the same cylinder or two different engines, it doesn't look to me like you can blame this entirely on the ring lands. It looks more to be isolated to that cylinder. As in, for some reason, (possibly due to your intake and/or cam configuration), that cylinder is seeing more boost than the others... expecting that fuel intake by the cylinders is equal per bank, (the cylinder looks like it was running lean as compared to the others, but that can happen from too much boost, just as easily as from too little fuel). Does the other bank tell a similar story, (middle cylinder leaner than the others)?
This seems to show a strong argument against using SVT cams with boost. You ARE using SVT cams right? What's your intake manifold configuration?
Easy there... I calls it like I sees it.first of all
That makes it even worse IMO. Something about that cylinder is allowing it to get more boost or less fuel. Number four looks like it's ingesting droplets of fuel as opposed to an atomized mixture of air & fuel, so if this didn't happen when it did in 5, it probably would not have taken much longer for something to happen with 4. If the other bank is as good as you say, I would take a GOOD look at your LIM as it mounts to the heads and your UIM. See if there maybe needs to be some port-matching done for smoother transitions. If that all is good, perhaps your O2 is giving a biased reading to the PCM for bank 2. I mean, there's a bunch of possibilities, but something is definitely not working right on that side.the car isnt even driven on a regular basis.
Easy there... I calls it like I sees it.
That makes it even worse IMO. Something about that cylinder is allowing it to get more boost or less fuel. Number four looks like it's ingesting droplets of fuel as opposed to an atomized mixture of air & fuel, so if this didn't happen when it did in 5, it probably would not have taken much longer for something to happen with 4. If the other bank is as good as you say, I would take a GOOD look at your LIM as it mounts to the heads and your UIM. See if there maybe needs to be some port-matching done for smoother transitions. If that all is good, perhaps your O2 is giving a biased reading to the PCM for bank 2. I mean, there's a bunch of possibilities, but something is definitely not working right on that side.
you need the better engine. you should have one by that build date. its all about the boost pressure.
http://www.rumodded.com/warmonger/pistons/pistons.htm
I'm not discounting this theory, and I don't want to start a p*ssing match, but if it's all, and ONLY about boost, why are there only two damaged pistons? If everything is the way it should be, all cylinders should be seeing the same boost and fuel pressure. Given those beliefs, ALL pistons should show some damage if they're the weak link. Do you believe it's merely coincidence that the same piston failed in the same spot... and on different builds?its all about the boost pressure.
I'm not discounting this theory, and I don't want to start a p*ssing match, but if it's all, and ONLY about boost, why are there only two damaged pistons? If everything is the way it should be, all cylinders should be seeing the same boost and fuel pressure. Given those beliefs, ALL pistons should show some damage if they're the weak link. Do you believe it's merely coincidence that the same piston failed in the same spot... and on different builds?
I'm just curious was you using 3l heads and was the injectors you was using for a oval port or split port? Cause if you was using split port injectors in a oval port head maybe it's as sicse suggested that the one piston looks like the fuel wasn't atomized. Which is what would happen if using split port injectors In Oval port heads