Dyno'd the SVT today

[fordman302]

Well a shop here in town just bought a dyno and had half off runs..Heck why not right?

My numbers were
HP
165.1@6671
With WCF 169.8

TQ
138.0@3205
With WCF 141.9

Im not very impressed the car has MSDS headers y-pipe and intake..
He offered the put the bottle on it for me since mine was at home and i said no..
Also i was running the NGK tr6's IIRC setup for nitrous..I will be putting the Autolite DP's back in soon.

EDIT: This was done on a Mustang Dyno Powerdyne

 

[novellino21]

So no 3L? 2.5L? I really need to get my car tuned, so getting a tune on a mustang dyno isnt as good? Or doesnt make a difference?

 

[95pgt-t]

doesnt look like corrected numbers:shrug: mustang and dynapak's are generally like 10-15% lower. some say they're more accurate.

 

[fordman302]

Its a 2.5L..And ive been told the Mustang dynos are lower too the TQ number is what scares me..

 

[TRicker]

my 2.5L with headers and full exhaust and a safc enhanced fuel curve made 166/144 with 155k on the clock man.

 

[fordman302]

my 2.5L with headers and full exhaust and a safc enhanced fuel curve made 166/144 with 155k on the clock man.

I have 125K on it right now..I will be getting a Trubendz cat-back pretty soon to free up some power hopefully.

 

[95pgt-t]

those should be stock numbers:shrug:

 

[fordman302]

Stock numbers at the wheels

165 hp @ 6600 RPM
148 lb./ft. @ (2700 and 4400) RPM

 

[svttour]

Post the dyno graph

 

[95pgt-t]

were your stock numbers on the same dyno? or same type? cause i'm doubting highly that your numbers are corrected. if so..you've got some issues somewere... vris working?

 

[fordman302]

I pulled those stock numbers from a website..

 

[95pgt-t]

gotcha. well those numbers were most likely done on a dynojet. seeing how its the most common and most widely used.
w/a 10% correction your prob. be more inline w/the mods you have.

 

[hotdimmes]

that TQ seems pretty low to me. heck I pulled 150tq on my normal 2.5L with just intake and borla 2.25" exhaust.

 

[fordman302]

Yeah its a shame..But i think alot has to do with the Dyno it was on..

 

[JoeM]

TQ is WAY too low!

 

[TRicker]

you may want to get a tune if you free up the exhaust that much. i think it'll run fine but if you got all the bolt on's a tune is worth it. you know this, why am i saying it....

 

[fordman302]

you may want to get a tune if you free up the exhaust that much. i think it'll run fine but if you got all the bolt on's a tune is worth it. you know this, why am i saying it....

Its tuned..by Warmonger for N/A and then one for Nitrous.

 

[turbo_fox]

doesnt look like corrected numbers:shrug: mustang and dynapak's are generally like 10-15% lower. some say they're more accurate.

if you look at how they work, there really should be no question that a mustang is more accurate. The mustang dyno is loaded where as a dynojet is an inertia dyno. Sure, it's 10-15% lower, but if you are tuning, it gives you a better tune.

 

[TRicker]

yeah.... mustangs dyno is loaded....causing my piston to shatter why it happenned there i don't know. multiple uses on the ground, why then? why there? could the dyno have been loaded wrong?

 

[fornetti14]

Mustang Dyno at SZ07

My Mystique with the 2.5L
151 hp
163 tq

200,000 miles on that thing!
It had an open K&N and Bat y-pipe with the high flow cat. That was it.

I'm hoping my SVT does better at SZ08