I didn't think you were going to get your panties all in a bunch.
This is condescending and snide, yet if I were to rebutt in an effort to defend myself, you would try to make ME out to be the bad guy.
You don't know me enough to pass judgment like this. BY all means it's the internet, say what you want....based on your posts here your the one looking like an ass right now
I have passed my judgement based
only on what I DO know of you, which is from posts on here. It's my assessment of your personality on here and though I'm sure there are people who have a strongly different one, it doesn't make mine incorrect
to me. If you were to prove it wrong, my assessment would change. Until then, if it makes me appear an ass, then sobeit.
It's funny that you did to me what you try to avoid
To be honest....this screams childish behavior all over it.
I think you need to get over your self.
One of my shortcomings is that I have trouble letting smartass coments go unrequited. But this is another, in a line of MANY from you, that I WILL let go.
To talk about being stubborn, you have a history of arguing the normal and what has been proven to work. Don't let me go back to the Se pcm......after what, months of you arguing about it, and in the end, you were wrong.
I AM stubborn at times, but you need to recheck your facts about the SE PCM. Some of my ideas and theories about the root case were wrong, yes, however, the PCM works exactly as it should - which was my base argument that many disagreed with. The reality is that the PCM is seeing a fault of some sort that I could not pin down, (but at least I can say that I TRIED to pin it down & didn't just pass it off as "the way it is"). The PCM initiates it's full-rich fuel strategy at the sight of the fault, and that's what kills the power up top.
My base argument was from a programming standpoint in that the PCM is
not programmed to
randomly go full-rich, (which is what LOOKS to be happening, if one doesn't understand what they're seeing). If I'm wrong because I could not pinpoint the root cause, then everyone else is also wrong for the same reason. Bottom line - it's not SUPPOSED to do that.
The thing is, It took you months to finally admit it. It took dozens of people saying the same thing over and over again, and for some reason you were soo stubborn you didn't want to believe the 20+ people posting in that thread. I never posted anything in that section, but as soon as you started to tamper with your exhaust, you came in here arguing everything. :shrug: Soo it seems every time you mod something you come into that section with something to prove. Split port manifolds, 70+mm tb etc etc.
I'm just a different breed. If someone tells me that something doesn't work, I'm curious why. If said someone can explain to me why it doesn't work, and it actually makes sense, then I go with it. However, if my inquiry to understand something is met with attitude or something like "that's just the way it is", then I take the statement as conjecture and look to prove or disprove it myself, often by asking more questions. You incorrectly assess my inquiries and rebuttles as arguments. It's an easy mistake to make, but still a mistake nonetheless.
You carry that..my crap don't stink attitude. Well here's the deal..why don't you grow up, learn to approach any situation with a level head. If your not getting anywhere with the person......LET IT GO....like i'm going to do with you right now.
You "let it go" only AFTER yet another incorrect assessment, more condescension, and just blatant ignorance. But I am the childish one.
If we're going to go back and forth, we can at least be on topic. So, in your opinion, what causes rasp Harry? And please have your reference material handy or mark your statements as personal experience.