Yeah, I've learned its easier just to ignore him, not really worth the time. Excellent moderator though :nonono: :laugh:
It was put up there just to show people the car but I guess I left something out of the clip, the torque number...260 ft/lbs!
Now with that, it would make quick work of your CSVT for sure and its an auto to boot, sorry about the confusion and maybe next time I'll put this in the correct forum....oh wait, I did
1. You needed a video to show people the car... so what the pictures you posted were not enough? Pretty sure the second picture you posted proved to show more then the amazingly crisp and clear video you posted.
2. Really... quick work? Some how I doubt it. But if you want to play the "I have a bigger dick" argument feel free to read up on the Camaro I own :shrug:... oh and it's an auto to boot too :laugh:
3. Correct forum? Where did I say anything about putting it in the wrong forum...
I think you've been smoking to much crack today bud. Take a chill pill and call me in the morning.
Finally I did check out your Camaro and its stats...508 hp...urr I mean 508 BHP, please! Your motor is putting out a total 10:25:1 compression, "camelback" heads which I thought were only available on early to mid 60's Vettes (can't remember) and even with a good flow and port job aren't going to give you those kind of numbers and your cam, 525 lift...what is the duration @.050 again? Also I see your running a double pumper carb, works great on an automatic, plus its 700 cfm, a bit much IMO. How about the intake, wait let me guess, single plane right:shrug: How did the dyno on this car, could we all see the sheet here, I'd love to see it if its the actual car that did it. I'm an old"er" street racer from the early 90's and one thing I know is s/b Chevrolet, let me explain: Mine had a JSP mild stage 4 tune with about 325ft lbs of torque! Fun car...First off let's not get the tread locked with the bigger unit stuff! Second I shot the video with my camera phone and it was just to show people out there how much power Saab's can make with proper tune because IMO 260 dt/lbs of torque is pretty impressive in my opinion and that was on this particular dyno! Next you didn't say anything about the wrong forum, I put that up there tounge in cheek
-1978 Caprice Classic 2 door
-406 s/b (.030 over 400)
-5.7 rods and steel crank
-Edelbrock Perf RPM intake
-Ultradyne hydrolic cam (507/530-239/246@.050)
-Dart II iron heads w/2.05/1.60 ss valves, ported
-1 5/8" headers, forgot the brand
-350 turbo, shift kit and 4000 stall
-8.5" stock housing rearend w/4.88 gears
-Koni drag shocks in the front, no sway bar, V6 coils and Comp Eng drag shocks in the rear
Now I never took the car to the track because I didn't have access to a trailer and couldn't drive the car to the track for obvious reasons but I did cruize the car and street race it. I put two years on that engine set up, sold it to my then boss and he took the car to the track where I was allowed to make a pass in the car....12.38@108 mph in a two ton car running pump gas. I bring all this up for cred on the internet where everyone can be anything, but people who've known me for the past 9 YEARS I've been on here know I don't B.S. about these things, so in closing I'm sure your 350 isn't putting out 508 BHP because based on what you've posted about your Camaro, it would be crushed by "FRANKNESTIEN", that's what I called it and you can even see the car in GM Hi-Tech Perf magazine but that was a long time ago, 1994 or 95 issue.
The Saab would beat your CSVT too, no shame in that:shrug: Bench racing at its finest!
What exactly is a 'mild stage 4 tune'? Stage 8 must be the un-milder version? :laugh:My old Saab was faster
Love the rims!
No definitely not trying to be a dick, hence the smiley
Just laughing at the term, sounds contradicktory.
-J
First off let's not get the tread locked with the bigger unit stuff! Second I shot the video with my camera phone and it was just to show people out there how much power Saab's can make with proper tune because IMO 260 dt/lbs of torque is pretty impressive in my opinion and that was on this particular dyno! Next you didn't say anything about the wrong forum, I put that up there tounge in cheek
-1978 Caprice Classic 2 door
-406 s/b (.030 over 400)
-5.7 rods and steel crank
-Edelbrock Perf RPM intake
-Ultradyne hydrolic cam (507/530-239/246@.050)
-Dart II iron heads w/2.05/1.60 ss valves, ported
-1 5/8" headers, forgot the brand
-350 turbo, shift kit and 4000 stall
-8.5" stock housing rearend w/4.88 gears
-Koni drag shocks in the front, no sway bar, V6 coils and Comp Eng drag shocks in the rear
Now I never took the car to the track because I didn't have access to a trailer and couldn't drive the car to the track for obvious reasons but I did cruize the car and street race it. I put two years on that engine set up, sold it to my then boss and he took the car to the track where I was allowed to make a pass in the car....12.38@108 mph in a two ton car running pump gas. I bring all this up for cred on the internet where everyone can be anything, but people who've known me for the past 9 YEARS I've been on here know I don't B.S. about these things, so in closing I'm sure your 350 isn't putting out 508 BHP because based on what you've posted about your Camaro, it would be crushed by "FRANKNESTIEN", that's what I called it and you can even see the car in GM Hi-Tech Perf magazine but that was a long time ago, 1994 or 95 issue.
The Saab would beat your CSVT too, no shame in that:shrug: Bench racing at its finest!