kscontourkid
Veteran CEG'er
deffinetly will want a bumper. this sounds awesome. i would like a good splitter for the std. SE bumpers. my car has the SE sideskirts and id like to get a front splitter to match it.
im interested to hear a price on a pair of sideskirts with no jackpoint covers. How much do these parts usually cost?
Im intrested in a window wind and a lip spoiler.
Im intrested in a window wind and a lip spoiler.
what is a window wind ????
I agree with you on making it functional, but you could still make it functional and improve ground clearance slightly. My car is completely stock and when I had it on the lift you could still see where the factory bumper cover has scrapes underneath. If you lower the car and have a splitter it will rub even if your careful. Like I said earlier, I like the look of the front splitter, but I'd only be in the market for one that is more flexible and slightly higher than the Mirko. I'm sure this would be the majority vote as well.i personally think that if you made a front splitter for both an SVT and a similar one for a non-svt more people would buy. it may be a little more expensive but there are a lot more non svt contours out there than there are svt and so the market is much greater. by selling the non svt front splitters to more people i would pick up the difference for the svt splitter.
the mirko splitter is a functional splitter. if you do alter it please try and keep the original function of it. if you have to lift it in the front a bit try and keep the back down to create a venturi effect to keep the original down-force characteristics of the original. PLEASE let me see if i can find the website that i found some very good info on splitter design. form AND function is always more appealing to the masses.
That does sound pretty cool. I think whether people would be in or not is going to depend on price.
I may be interested in the CF pre-98 trunklid/spoiler if the price is right...
I agree with you on making it functional, but you could still make it functional and improve ground clearance slightly. My car is completely stock and when I had it on the lift you could still see where the factory bumper cover has scrapes underneath. If you lower the car and have a splitter it will rub even if your careful. Like I said earlier, I like the look of the front splitter, but I'd only be in the market for one that is more flexible and slightly higher than the Mirko. I'm sure this would be the majority vote as well.
As far as an SE front goes, I'd say although there are more SEs, the SVT market for this product would be larger than the SE market :shrug: . Wouldn't the SE look better with the SVT front anyway?
-J
I understand there are more SEs than SVTs, but I'd still say an SVT front bumper would sell better than a bumper for SEs.Oh, and sorry for the post-whoring, but just making parts for SVTs is not in your best interest. AliasJerk and others (myself included) really want parts. Also, don't forget that you also have a large market in us pre-98 guys
Damn, that on an SHO would be hotfire.
http://www.mirkoracing.com/partsimages/fp2_lg.jpg
almost like this...
http://panamapat.no-ip.info/SHO/Pic/PPIR_1005/051008111757.jpg
Oh, and sorry for the post-whoring, but just making parts for SVTs is not in your best interest. AliasJerk and others (myself included) really want parts. Also, don't forget that you also have a large market in us pre-98 guys
anyways... i agree with having a little extra ground clearance with the new bumper. if it ends up with the same clearance as a stock bumper with a mirko, im definitely out. air ride + mirko = smashed up splitter the first time i drop it to the ground