better not be on an unbroken in car...tsk tsk
I don't buy in to the OEM 'break in' theories /Shrug. My dad hasn't either. All of our motors / cars have been faster than similar counterparts.
better not be on an unbroken in car...tsk tsk
I don't buy in to the OEM 'break in' theories /Shrug. My dad hasn't either. All of our motors / cars have been faster than similar counterparts.
They're not faster, you and your pops are just better drivers.![]()
The initial start-up break-in is absolutely vital to engine longevity in flat-tappet engines like the Zetec or older engines... but much less important, if not unecessary with the roller-rocker, OHC engines widely used now. However, a couple hundred light-to-moderate miles and at least a months worth of operating range heat cycles is a good idea IMO, regardless of engine. I guess it just depends on who you ask. Sh*t, according to Ford, there is no longer a break-in period at all, on anything. Then again, they ARE trying to sell you something... like parts once you're out of warranty, or another car within 100k. Personally, I like how the new "recommended" oil change interval is 7500 miles on some cars. :nonono:
Now, I'm not knocking synthetic by any means. It's well known that it offers sybstantially better and longer protection than regular oil. But how long it does so, depends on too many variables for a blanket mileage statement to be considered accurate.
Its true, the M Roadster gets changed every 25K. Racing synthetic anyone?Fixed. :laugh:
Would you happen to have the reference material handy fromt his study? Should be an interesting read.