B BrApple No Life But CEG Moderator Joined Dec 23, 2001 Messages 21,684 Location Gales Ferry, CT Sep 4, 2010 #21 mnewxcv said: ive always hated that video. they say the contour is best bang for the buck, and best performing. and it gets 3rd place. they say the bmw "disappoints", and it gets 2nd. Click to expand... take a number, alot of us feel the same way.
mnewxcv said: ive always hated that video. they say the contour is best bang for the buck, and best performing. and it gets 3rd place. they say the bmw "disappoints", and it gets 2nd. Click to expand... take a number, alot of us feel the same way.
B BAD SVT Addicted CEG'er Joined Dec 19, 2005 Messages 6,520 Location Formerly Las Vegas, now Dallas TX Sep 6, 2010 #22 ThNdFrSpd said: I thought the Camaro had slightly faster 0-60 times? Click to expand... nope. 'stang is quicker. i'll find a video... edit- here it is: http://www.motortrend.com/av/roadte...maro_ss_2010_challenger_srt8_video/index.html
ThNdFrSpd said: I thought the Camaro had slightly faster 0-60 times? Click to expand... nope. 'stang is quicker. i'll find a video... edit- here it is: http://www.motortrend.com/av/roadte...maro_ss_2010_challenger_srt8_video/index.html
T ThNdFrSpd CEG'er Joined Nov 15, 2008 Messages 243 Location Eau Claire, WI Sep 6, 2010 #23 Must have been the quarter mile times then. I got my info from a road and track or car and driver magazine. http://www.roadandtrack.com/var/ezf...lication/58964d683b37ae39bcb569a75bba7421.pdf
Must have been the quarter mile times then. I got my info from a road and track or car and driver magazine. http://www.roadandtrack.com/var/ezf...lication/58964d683b37ae39bcb569a75bba7421.pdf
