cobrawannabe
Addicted CEG'er
Beat ya to it!:laugh:
-
Welcome to the Contour Enthusiasts Group, the best resource for the Ford Contour and Mercury Mystique.
You can register to join the community.
2010 Ford Mustang
- Thread starter LilCe98
- Start date
BAD SVT
Addicted CEG'er
Ahem.
Should *have* known that.
Sorry... can't correct someone on grammar and commit a grammar mistake in the same post w/out getting crap for it.
:laugh::laugh: Ouch! nice work fellas
PurpleMystique
Hard-core CEG'er
Congratulations to everyone on identifying the joke.
Desiato
Hard-core CEG'er
Another design by committee/focus group from Ford imo. Lacks soul, consistency and purpose.
morbid
Hard-core CEG'er
meh... looks like just another rustang. If Ford was really interested in revitalizing that platform, they should borrow heavily from their Aussie FPG line. Better yet... get rid of it finally, and start selling FPG cars here.
PurpleMystique
Hard-core CEG'er
Klevar!!
cobrawannabe
Addicted CEG'er
PurpleMystique
Hard-core CEG'er
Wasn't a joke.
We're just messin with ya, it's a pretty common mistake
Uh...I know it's a common mistake. The joke I made was correcting a "sounds like" error while making one. I should have known no one would appreciate it. I don't make mistakes.
bishop375
Hard-core CEG'er
Yeah, that'd be smart. Get rid of one of its biggest sellers, and one of it's most iconic vehicles.
I wouldn't mind seeing some of the FPG stuff here, don't get me wrong. But throw it at Mercury and leave the Mustang as it is.
cougardizz
New CEG'er
I like it, but a nice set of rims would make it SO much better IMO
Pope
Veteran CEG'er
I have to say that my interest in the Hyundai Genesis Coupe and Nissan 370Z are well placed.
PurpleMystique
Hard-core CEG'er
How can you whine about grammatical errors and then make two mistakes in this sentence?
BAD SVT
Addicted CEG'er
DUDE LET IT GO!!! sheeesh!
. the simple fact that u're hampering this grammar thing shows u're a bit insecure, and the fact that u did make a mistake. we're human. who would've guessed. we were all just playing around. the boards have been quite boring as of recent.PurdySVT
Veteran CEG'er
Is this what you mean? this car is sweet... all modern with an old skin.
http://www.retrobuilt.com/rsc_gt.html
PurpleMystique
Hard-core CEG'er
Ah, thank you psychologist and author Dr. BAD SVT. It's good to know that you know my thoughts and intentions better than I do.
PurpleMystique
Hard-core CEG'er
Is this what you mean? this car is sweet... all modern with an old skin.
http://www.retrobuilt.com/rsc_gt.html
That just looks like an '05 Mustang with a nose job. Although the '10 Mustang's longer hood overhang does remind me of the '68 GT500s.
cobrawannabe
Addicted CEG'er
I like Mustangs... And the new one is very cool
I also like being on topic and no dwindling on last week's arguments...
One thing that kind of irked me is that Ford has, once again, forgotten the balls. While it will be fast, the new Challenger and Camaro will probably beat it. All they did was rice out the air box...:nonono:
I also like being on topic and no dwindling on last week's arguments...
One thing that kind of irked me is that Ford has, once again, forgotten the balls. While it will be fast, the new Challenger and Camaro will probably beat it. All they did was rice out the air box...:nonono:
BAD SVT
Addicted CEG'er
thx. i try
Is this what you mean? this car is sweet... all modern with an old skin.
http://www.retrobuilt.com/rsc_gt.html
i remember that company. i saw them @ SEMA last year. i'm pretty sure they were there this year also. i'd buy that stang. looks smokin'!
Unfortunately, it's a reskin where a redesign is needed. Another case of Ford changing too little and letting things go too long in the tooth.
RawBurt, how do you test an interior? Is it just about durability and objective parameters, or do you get to also offer subjective look/touch/feel assessments on the ambiance, ergonomics, and whether things really work? It seems to me that all too many interiors are designed and nobody ever really uses them before they go into production across the board. My leading pet peeve is a lack of a seat height adjustment on the front passenger seat, as there are MANY cars I can sit in the driver's seat and fit, but not the passenger seat.
I'd honestly love to have a job where I can analyze car designs, but I like being able to do it with the financial information I deal with too...
RawBurt, how do you test an interior? Is it just about durability and objective parameters, or do you get to also offer subjective look/touch/feel assessments on the ambiance, ergonomics, and whether things really work? It seems to me that all too many interiors are designed and nobody ever really uses them before they go into production across the board. My leading pet peeve is a lack of a seat height adjustment on the front passenger seat, as there are MANY cars I can sit in the driver's seat and fit, but not the passenger seat.
I'd honestly love to have a job where I can analyze car designs, but I like being able to do it with the financial information I deal with too...
Last edited:
PurpleMystique
Hard-core CEG'er
As far as I can tell, you're the only one bringing up anything of the sort. Also you meant to say "dwelling." I'd make an obvious joke here, but no one would get it.
Have they released anything solid about the engines yet? There were rumors of a Modular 5.0, but I didn't see anything on the Ford site or in Google yet.
Also, I can't believe those idiots at Ford used a plastic oval port intake manifold.