fordman302
Hard-core CEG'er
5.8L 351..
Nothing special but plenty of TQ
Nothing special but plenty of TQ
2.0,2.4,2.4,2.5,3.3,4.7
17.3 litres.
Hmm now for HP
132
127
155
200
40 WOOT!
200
854.
Hmm I need more pics.
The 6s is not 230 from the factory!!! And no way is an intake on a Duratec adding that much hp. And you're talking about power at the engine. Dyno that car and post up the numbers!!!!! Here is a 6s dyno with intake, header, and exhaust! Ohhh whopping 200hp. And you don't even have headers & exhaust. With parasitic loss that does not equate to 255hp at the engine!!!! Don't try to tout a Duratec equipped car on these boards! Give me a freakin break!
i don't KNOW you.. or even begin to pretend..
BUT:
that sounded an AWFUL lot like a copout to me. You said a number, it was wrong, and it was proven (well.. real-world proven) as such, now all of a sudden you were "just messing around"????
BS.
Sounds like flamebait to me.The only reason I put that number in my post was to see if I could get someone stirred up.
you mean 2.5 or 3.0's in general?? cause the probe doesn't have a duratec....
if you do, i've got a 2.5 5 Cylinder....turbo of course :laugh:
Wait.. you like to argue.. contructively at that, and yet you put out BOGUS NUMBERS, SIMPLY TO STIR UP A RESPONSE?
Maybe I don't have an EE degree, or applied mathematics minor, or even any experience with the SAE, but... what part of that is.. ahem.. "Constructive"? Damn, its too bad they don't teach common sense in college.
false number just to get a riseconstructive arguing, in fact its:
| rude and condescending | (Please notice, those are absolute value bars.. I figured a man with your EE, applied mathematics, and SAE background would appreciate that. )
Don't get me wrong, now. I don't want to waste any time debating something that won't get changed, but at the same time, I can't stand when someone tosses out degrees, and background as a superflous means of justifying their actions or findings. Regardless is you had a doctorate's in EE, or mathematics.. you're still not being nearly as "constructive" as you like to think.
So let me get this straight....if you were to go buy a new car, and the brochure specs say it has 200hp, but in reality it only makes 160hp at the wheels on a dyno machine, you would tell everyone that your car is 160hp?
If a sales person were to tell you a car was 200hp, would you call him a liar since you know that car won't produce that number on a dyno machine?
Come on....grow up and do something productive with your time rather than try to argue this stupid point.
... Laugh it off, say you screwed up, and get on with life.
All I asked was what anyone had that has a 2.5L or 3L other than a Duratec engine.... How could that go wrong? :crazy: