|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by Phil Rohtla:
most manufacturers will go with the solid (as in non vented) rotors because it is cheaper.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Klasse Act
|
09/28/05 04:11 PM
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Phil Rohtla_dup1
|
09/28/05 04:15 PM
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
DemonSVT_dup1
|
09/28/05 04:53 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Rara_dup1
|
09/28/05 05:12 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Klasse Act
|
09/28/05 05:55 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
GoldenTour
|
09/28/05 06:12 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
RogerB_dup1
|
09/28/05 07:08 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Todd TCE_dup1
|
09/29/05 01:41 AM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Big Jim_dup1
|
09/29/05 01:44 AM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Klasse Act
|
09/29/05 03:29 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Barge
|
09/29/05 04:06 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Auto-X Fil
|
09/29/05 09:07 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
MxRacer
|
09/29/05 10:34 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Auto-X Fil
|
09/29/05 11:10 PM
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Klasse Act
|
09/29/05 11:11 PM
|
|
Re: Solid rear rotors, why?
|
Kremithefrog
|
09/29/05 11:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|