|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475 |
"svtjeff": DemonSVT has admitted he is wrong before, I even remember one specific thread where he put his foot in his mouth arguing with a guy about an engine rebuild. BUT ... 99% of the time he is spot on with his information and reccomendations! He has a very solid track record of providing excellent advice to the people on this site. SO if youre going to come on here, with NO credibility and information to back your arguments up, you're not going to get anywhere.  Just something to think about. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,166
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,166 |
Originally posted by SVT Doood:
1st..I am not the one claiming to be an expert, am I there Jeff. You come into this site like a ton of bricks..."uuhhh, I can't scan it it..." and expect us to to say yeah, you're right with what, your words versus countless times the boys on here have been right?
Hold on. He asked for the best advice to post his PDF. He says he has information, give him a chance to post it. IMO way to many people on here lambast others on this site for trying to provide information. I personally haven't looked into the facts of the UIM (Have you?) and just took veterans information as fact. I am interested to see his evidence before jumping to conclusions.
Originally posted by SVT Doood:
2nd...under a previous log-in I had over 1200 posts, so
suck on that for a while.
What does this prove? There are a bunch of people on here that have tons of posts and I will NEVER pay attention to what they said. We know who they are...
Originally posted by SVT Doood:
3rd...I doubt it. Unless you're up for the Red-Bull find an american driver, I won't be sh*t impressed with you.
blah blah blah...
Originally posted by SVT Doood:
4th...take your juvenille comments somewhere else. You have no idea who or what I am, and your presumption may get the best of you...
Hey, you're the one that attacked him. I think with all the people attacking him, he's done a great job at keeping his cool. Lets give him a chance to provide his data.
Last edited by zgendron; 06/10/04 08:53 PM.
- Zack
WANTED: T-Red HEATED Side Mirrors
FOR SALE: 4 14" Alum Alloys and Nearly New Avid H4s Tires w/ Center Caps
2000 T-Red SVT
1995 LX V6 MTX (RIP)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,887
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,887 |
Blah Blah Blah wheres the proof??????
06 GMC Sierra 2500HD Dmax/ally
06 Pontiac G6 GT
05 CRF250R
FOR SALE 06 KX65 with riding gear $2700 obo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,676
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,676 |
this dude is on crack. moving on. . .
I think ANYBODY that's ANYBODY knows that there's a difference in the UIM's. . .where's Terry when you need him?
Suneil
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 55
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 55 |
Originally posted by SVT Doood:
Originally posted by svtjeff:
Originally posted by SVT Doood:
Originally posted by svtjeff:
Lastly, I really love it how some people think they know it all. I will not mention his name, but suffice to say he always plays the demon's advocate��or is that devil's advocate���:)
Well..if the proof is in the pudding...
He's run a 13.94 1/4 mile at 101.6mph... 
That makes him the fastest N/A Tour on the site... 
And you've....????
Yeah, that's what I thought... 
Mr 49 posts and know's more than the bro's that have been doing this for more than a while. I've yet to see Kyser, Bnoon, Warmonger, or Hightower say that anything demon has said has been wrong. Theguy does his home work before posting his thoughts, and most of his postings come from direct experience.
OK MR 196 Posts. If that is the best you have, then you must be a genius. Lets just say I do not run my mouth like you because it shows lack of intelligence and reminds me of juvenile logic.
Anytime you want to go to the track or dyno for that matter, let me know. I am sure you will be impressed then��.
1st..I am not the one claiming to be an expert, am I there Jeff. You come into this site like a ton of bricks..."uuhhh, I can't scan it it..." and expect us to to say yeah, you're right with what, your words versus countless times the boys on here have been right?
2nd...under a previous log-in I had over 1200 posts, so
suck on that for a while.
3rd...I doubt it. Unless you're up for the Red-Bull find an american driver, I won't be sh*t impressed with you.
4th...take your juvenille comments somewhere else. You have no idea who or what I am, and your presumption may get the best of you...
Likewise Jack A##. You post BS and expect me to lay down. Dont think so.
Whenever your ready to jump, let me know. I'll be waiting.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975 |
Up until now, you're all talk.
Either provide some evidence or get lost.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 80
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 80 |
Originally posted by svtjeff:
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Why are the ports an the 98/98.5 UIM smaller then the 99+ UIM?  Not sure how you are measuring the hole size, but calipers is not the way to get an accurate reading.
Right.......
So what is more accurate?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by svtjeff:
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Why are the ports an the 98/98.5 UIM smaller then the 99+ UIM? Not sure how you are measuring the hole size, but calipers is not the way to get an accurate reading.
Digital caliper with 2" levers.
I measured the port size and final 2" taper.
I took multiple measurements around the arc and averaged the results.
I realize that using just the outward lip diameter of the port would give erroneous readings. For one thing the ports are not even round.
For that matter this is the same way I port matched and tapered all the work I have done. I am not kidding folks when I say the Demon is in the detail work. Smooth equal transitions are key.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,166
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,166 |
Originally posted by SVT ST PETE:
Up until now, you're all talk.
Either provide some evidence or get lost.
I'm not really sure this proves anything, but he provided me the following PDF files to upload.
1998_UIM
1999 UIM
2000 UIM
- Zack
WANTED: T-Red HEATED Side Mirrors
FOR SALE: 4 14" Alum Alloys and Nearly New Avid H4s Tires w/ Center Caps
2000 T-Red SVT
1995 LX V6 MTX (RIP)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by zgendron:
I'm not really sure this proves anything, but he provided me the following PDF files to upload.
You will note the date on the 98 & 00 pdf picture is the same. (same exact thing)
It does show the FORD PART NUMBER changed between the 98 file and 99 file.
It does not show any specs at all beyond the composition of the UIM and powdercoating.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
