|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,346
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,346 |
what do you guys think....i know the answer........just wanted to know what you all think would happen
E1 CSVT
s/c-----x
turbo---x
3L------check
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 71
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 71 |
well, I think the Eclipse would find it self being the proud owner of a new exit-hole (if ya know what I mean).
Red 2000 SVT Contour. Can you say "factory freak"?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,359
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,359 |
I don't know about all that. I believe that model of Eclipse did 0-60 in 6.9 sec which would be slightly faster than a CSVT. I would have to say this race would be highly dependant upon the driver (and mods).
98' Contour SVT
#607 of 6535
05' Mazda 6s
Audio/Visual enthusiast because it's one of the many things I went through 4 years of hell for
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065 |
Originally posted by bullion:
I don't know about all that. I believe that model of Eclipse did 0-60 in 6.9 sec which would be slightly faster than a CSVT. I would have to say this race would be highly dependant upon the driver (and mods).
I ripped a new one on an eclipse...this was about 1.5 yrs ago, I was near stock... 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,128
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,128 |
Originally posted by bullion:
I don't know about all that. I believe that model of Eclipse did 0-60 in 6.9 sec which would be slightly faster than a CSVT. I would have to say this race would be highly dependant upon the driver (and mods).
A stock 99+ CSVT IS 6.9 0-60 so how is it slightly faster?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,359
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,359 |
I could have sworn the SVT was 7.1 sec, but I may be wrong.
98' Contour SVT
#607 of 6535
05' Mazda 6s
Audio/Visual enthusiast because it's one of the many things I went through 4 years of hell for
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,016
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,016 |
The GT Spyders are SLOW! Me and my wife test drove one, and it was a manual to. I wasn't impressed. It didn't feel like it had 225hp or so. I don't think my stock CSVT would have a problem taking one.
2006 Mazdaspeed6
1997 Yamaha YZF1000R Thunderace
1996 Volvo 850-R
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065 |
Originally posted by bullion:
I could have sworn the SVT was 7.1 sec, but I may be wrong.
Could have, but ya still wrong! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,359
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,359 |
98' Contour SVT
#607 of 6535
05' Mazda 6s
Audio/Visual enthusiast because it's one of the many things I went through 4 years of hell for
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779 |
The 5spd GTs are a close match. But the heavier, auto, convertible (Spyder) shouldn't be a problem at all.
99 SVTC, T-Red, #652/2760-12.8.1998
Mother#@%@!* did I sound abstract?
I hope it sounded more confusin than that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
