Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#902013 03/17/04 06:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
Check the archives, but yes, I recall some people having the same issues with the BAT bar as the Aussie bar wrt subframe/bracket failure. The great TH suggested to me that I consider reinforcement regardless of what bar I chose.

As for the diameter, check the archives again, but I think the BAT bar was something like 20.4 mm. The stock "19mm" bar is actually 18.x. To confuse matters even more, the early SE "19mm" bar and the later SVT "18mm" bar are, IIRC, exactly the same.


Function before fashion. '96 Contour SE "Toss the Contour into a corner, and it's as easy to catch as a softball thrown by a preschooler." -Edmunds, 1998
#902014 03/17/04 07:23 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
W
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
W
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
The BAT bar is indeed bigger in diameter and heavier than the SVT bar. I didn't need to use calipers when I swapped bars out. And it makes a *big* difference turning the car too -- remember that diameter in sway bars is a fourth power!!!


Whirling dervish of FFOG.
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Auto-X Fil 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5