|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191 |
Originally posted by DJ_SpaRky:
Oh yeah, you do know that it is NOT a Dodge motor, right?
It's a 4G64 DSM Motor, the same block as in the Galant, and it is as old as the SR
Actually the engine in the srt-4 is an A853 which was built buy dodge and has been used in the turbo stratus sold in mexico since 1994. The turbo is a mitsu however.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360 |
im sorry man, but i think there is no comparison...i might get beat on a straightline, but you take me on in the twiseites, i would love to see you take a hairpin at 70 in your neon, or even 60, let alon a good chicane. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191 |
I assume your talking to me? I dunno.... but anyways..... go here and tell me who got 8th?  what car got 9th? Oh a lamborghini? huh..... 2003 one lap of america results Keep an eye out for my buddy Dale Seeley in '04 SRT-4 this year. He placed 44th last year in a saturn SC1 with suspension upgrades and nitrous, winning his class.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360 |
dude, what i am saying is that my car has NO suspension mods. and onm steelies with goodyear spectras it will out handle quite a few of the same cars in its class, especially in the twisties.
[unrealted to topic] and what is this understeer eveyone keeps talking about? i can take a left turn at 40 and not have understeer, unless its raining.
Last edited by luvinmycontour; 12/01/03 07:00 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191 |
Oh, a 3L swap is fair game to keep up, but a modded supsension isn't okay? My bad, I didn't know the rules. I love these contour board arguments. 
Last edited by ATL-SVT; 12/01/03 08:16 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360 |
snt talking to you anyway  lol i was talking to boostjunkie, i think is what the name was.
Last edited by luvinmycontour; 12/01/03 08:29 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,191 |
haha
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11
New CEG\'er
|
|
New CEG\'er
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11 |
Word, Muh bads about the block thing, I guess because I couldn't find that info, and the galant is 2.4L, and I'm not saying that the SRT-4 is a bad car or anything, it's just not my style, to me it seems cheap(ly made).
As for the 03 SVT Cobra, that's another story, it's twice as much car, let alone the cost difference.
I'm just saying that a person that buys a $1000 240sx & swaps in a SR, then puts in another $5000, is going to be faster AND have a nicer (looking, riding, handling, RWD) car.
...and now back to the topic, in top MPH, the SVT, in Drags (1/4 & esp. 1/8) SRT, road course it depends on the track & the drive but prolly the SRT, cuz of quicker accelleration.
(sorry about the hijack, it was unintentional)
^
Look a dashed line. WOW! Now that is too cool. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,387
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,387 |
Depends on the road course, and too many other factors, people should not forget how successfully neons have been raced for many years, there is certainly a reason for this.
98 3.0 svt: Sold
|
|
|
|
|
