Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 20 1 2 3 4 5 19 20
#787442 11/04/03 05:02 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 97
D
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
D
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 97
Unoffically it ran 13.7 on 555R drag radials, took out heavy subs and everything out of the trunk. That day carlsbad was having some problems with the timing equipment so yeah... Thas why I don't post that number much since I can't really back it up.


David Zambrano tuner@slicktuning.com CSVT E1 #4808 You get what you pay for. All advice here is free. http://www.slicktuning.com -my homepage
#787443 11/04/03 05:47 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
Thanks David :-) I knew I seen that posted somewhere :-)


Ryan Trollin!
#787444 11/05/03 11:56 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 494
M
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
M
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 494
Most SRT-4s are very quick stock, I've seen them run 14.0 flat bone stock @ 101. A few mods and they're in the high 13's.

Now...a certain Silver SVT Turbo is pretty darn quick from 60-120....keep up with me in my slow automatic.


2000 WS6 Convertible A4 13.11 @ 107.5 with a lid, Ram Air and LTs Gone:95 Mystique LS Young America edition V6, MTX 15.6 @ 91
#787445 11/06/03 02:07 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 661
O
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
O
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 661
From a roll I loose one car length on a car that traps 100.xx


Fast Cheap reliable Pick two
#787446 11/06/03 02:43 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 487
W
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
W
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 487
Originally posted by MystiqueSVT:
Most SRT-4s are very quick stock, I've seen them run 14.0 flat bone stock @ 101. A few mods and they're in the high 13's.

Now...a certain Silver SVT Turbo is pretty darn quick from 60-120....keep up with me in my slow automatic.


On 5psi to boot... Now if I can run good at the track again...up for another visit Ryan?

I've got the car around 7psi right now..it puts you back once it hooks up!

I'll give you a call to set up the track "event".


2002 ZO6...462whp/410wtq pretty darn fast!11.70 @ 122 silver/black 2006 Trailblazer SS(wifes car) silver/black 2000 SVT-Turbo-sold silver/blue #1699/2150 13.83 @ 102.82 on 5psi 13.51 @ 107.56 on 8psi
#787447 11/06/03 03:24 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 206
B
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
B
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 206
Its just too bad that it takes a $23k car another $5k+ in mods to try to keep up to a 4cylinder SRT-4 Neon.

#787448 11/06/03 01:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087
B
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
B
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087
Originally posted by BBContourSVT:
Its just too bad that it takes a $23k car another $5k+ in mods to try to keep up to a 4cylinder SRT-4 Neon.



More like a $9000 car (or less) and +$5000 in mods.


Matt 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX (WRB Stage 4+) Old Rides: 1999 Sil-Fro SVT Contour 3.0L with goodies (Totalled 6/21/06) 1988 Bronco II (Sold) You know you launch hard when you beat oncoming traffic through their own crosswalk lines.
#787449 11/06/03 02:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 661
O
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
O
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 661
Cars are turning into what computers are now. You buy it and there is soemthing faster more powerul the next day. Some of our cars are getting close to being 10 years old so yea its going to take some money to keep up with the new car on the block. Factory boost is just the bomb.


Fast Cheap reliable Pick two
#787450 11/07/03 10:20 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 494
M
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
M
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 494
Sounds good to me! I need to buy some more mods so I can keep up with you...on the track. Of course.....we can just go from a dig this time....

I'm going on vacation next week...so maybe we can do it at the end of this month.


2000 WS6 Convertible A4 13.11 @ 107.5 with a lid, Ram Air and LTs Gone:95 Mystique LS Young America edition V6, MTX 15.6 @ 91
#787451 11/29/03 06:39 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10
B
New CEG\'er
Offline
New CEG\'er
B
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10
Just crusing the net and saw this, felt I had to contribute. Contour SVT vs SRT-4? In a few words, not a fair match up. Why? One chief reason: weight. You guys are frickin' heavy compared to the Neon. Power/Weight ratio plays a huge hand. Two: Turbo vs N/A. I'm sure your motors could put out some good power modded, but the were not designed as hi/po motors. The 2.4L in the SRT-4? Different story. Sport Compact Car did a complete write up of the motor's internals, a very good read which I recommend. Even you guys with turbo added are fighting Ford's engineering or rather, the fact that your motors are not designed for much more than fuel economy and reliability. Nor are your cars factory backed. SRT-4 has new parts from Mopar coming out on nearly a monthly basis, nevermind the aftermarket. The 2004's(which I have) are cutting anywhere from 14.0 to 13.8 STOCK. Nevermind those that have serious mods. So, while it's fun to bench race, let's keep some reality, ok?

IMHO the only two SVT's of any note are the Cobra and Lightning. Anything else is just bodykits and badging.

Not flaming, just pointing some things out.

Page 3 of 20 1 2 3 4 5 19 20

Moderated by  mbb41_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5