Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#607090 04/18/03 05:40 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 534
Z
Veteran CEG\'er
OP Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
Z
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 534
i follow the mustang crowd too. lots of guys are running longer connecting rods in their motors. from my understanding it improves the rod ratio. this helps increase piston speed and helps promote cylinder filling at lower rpms. this modification is especially beneficial to intake systems that have limtited breathing capacities, such as factory feul injection. has anyone else out there done any research on this for our motors? seems to me like this would help give us that low end punch that we lack...any increase in torque would abviously be beneficial, and we would still have complete use of our rev range.
custom rods would be obvious. pistons with a custom compression height as well. because it does not change the crank throws, as does stroking, i wouldn't think that there would be any block clearance issues.
just wanted to throw my brain storming out there, see if anybody else had thought of something similar. i would rather do this than a 3L swap. its is fun to tell people that my V6 is smaller than their 4 banger and watch their foreheads wrinkle in confusion


2000 csvt #1553 Black/Tan
#607091 04/18/03 05:48 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,299
J
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
J
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,299
a longer rod will not at all change the speed of the piston. It will however make the piston reach further up the cylinder, effectively increasing he compression ratio, a well known method if improving performance.

To increase piston speed a longer throw crankshaft is needed.


I feel sorry for the people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, thats the best they're going to feel all day - former President Lyndon B. Johnson
#607092 04/18/03 05:53 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Actually increasing the rod length would hurt low rpm scavenging.

Also shorter rods are more beneficial to low lift camshafts (I.E. like our DOHC engine has) & it also allows for longer duration without backflow.(again drastically to our benefit!)

Also the only time the shorter rod will have lower piston speed is around Bottom Dead Center. Not really a major concern IMO.

I personally do not see any benefits on our engine architecture.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#607093 04/18/03 06:32 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 534
Z
Veteran CEG\'er
OP Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
Z
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 534
actually...the piston speed does increase with the longer rods but it is only at TDC and BDC(this is because of the increased rod angle) unlike in a stroker wich increases speed throughout the cranks rotation. this is what helps cylinder filling on the long rod motor.
thanks for the input Demon...*POP*...that was my bubble.


2000 csvt #1553 Black/Tan
#607094 04/18/03 07:27 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 97
D
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
D
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 97
Our engine have a pretty ideal rod ratio of 1.6, that's what gives it it's rev happy demeanour and at the same time also gives it's long and flat torque curve. You could stick in a longer rod and have a custom piston done with a different pin hight to keep the pistons from protruding the block. But I doubt it will do any good for the amount of money that it would cost to have this one.


David Zambrano tuner@slicktuning.com CSVT E1 #4808 You get what you pay for. All advice here is free. http://www.slicktuning.com -my homepage
#607095 04/18/03 07:32 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 82
Y
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
Y
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 82
thats directly from the 3 liter GOD!!


-Y2K SVT- BORN 1/03/2000 DIED 02/29/2004
#607096 04/18/03 01:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,299
J
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
J
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,299
Originally posted by zm830101:
actually...the piston speed does increase with the longer rods but it is only at TDC and BDC(this is because of the increased rod angle) unlike in a stroker wich increases speed throughout the cranks rotation. this is what helps cylinder filling on the long rod motor.
thanks for the input Demon...*POP*...that was my bubble.




I was only thinking about piston speed over the entire stroke.


I feel sorry for the people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, thats the best they're going to feel all day - former President Lyndon B. Johnson
#607097 04/18/03 02:01 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 759
M
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
M
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 759
Well, if you are going through the trouble of custom rods/pistons, might as well offset-grind the crank to get a larger stroke. That would be very beneficial.


1998 SVT Contour E1, Black (Mine) - Winter 3.0 Project 2004 Sentra SE-R SpecV (Wifes) www.SuperHawkForum.com
#607098 04/18/03 02:20 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,621
B
Redneck Troll
Offline
Redneck Troll
B
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,621
Originally posted by Y2K-SVT:
thats directly from the 3 liter GOD!!




No, that's from the lucky bastard that baught the race heads from Reinke Motorsports before any of the rest of us saw them. I know I was about second or third in line for those heads simply because I didn't see them for sale soon enough... I was second or third in line for the custom long tube headers too.


http://www.bnmotorsports.com "And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my CEG brothers. And you will know I am the Moderator when I lay my vengeance upon you."
#607099 04/19/03 04:22 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 294
H
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
H
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 294
Different rod ratios are really insignificant when compared to bore stroke ratios, i.e., long stroke vs short stroke cranks.

A longer rod ratio effects dynamic compression, effectively making an engine build compression longer--Good when you have static compression limitations from racing rules.

It depends on the nature of the engine which rod ratio is better....but again, it really isn't that significant in terms of power production to lose any sleep over.



stock 1998 silver frost SVT E0 #1545 out of 6535 * K&N drop-in air filter * DMD * Koni's w/ stock springs * Autolite double platinum * Tranny cocktail * Mobil 1 Snyth Oil @ 60K miles
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5