|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516
Hard-core CEG'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516 |
I found these 2 so far (didn't look very much)
SC SVT Contour -
TC Cougar (Regular DURATEC) -
I know there were more on the old forums, but haven't checked there. Please add more!!!
Mazda 6S, V6, Speed Yellow
5 Speed, Sport package
Bose audio
Painted 'stash and HIDs!
w/Injen 1/4 14.750 @ 94.94
Former car:
99 Contour SE Sport Black MTX V6
SVT plastic...
1/4 - 15.012 @ 90.58
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,230
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,230 |
I don't know how else to say it but:
That's some mad yummy torque commin' out dat turbo yo!
David Z got 286HP/247ft tq out of a N/A 3L
MY NEW HOBBY...RUINING CHRIS CROFTS LIFE...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by nyceboi: David Z got 286HP/247ft tq out of a N/A 3L
About that at the CRANK Big difference then at the WHEELS.
He made around 240/210 at the wheels. Quite outstanding for N/A in the least!!! His peaks were very nice, but his power curves were a little lacking.
He did have almost 12:1 CR, 3L valves, race cams, and serious head work done though to get such numbers.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 339
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 339 |
I belive DavidZ's old motor is now in JJennings Cougar and it's now in the mid 250's at the wheels and awaiting the install of a stand alone management system. Gotta love that turbo torque.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,036
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,036 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT: Originally posted by nyceboi: David Z got 286HP/247ft tq out of a N/A 3L
About that at the CRANK Big difference then at the WHEELS.
He made around 240/210 at the wheels. Quite outstanding for N/A in the least!!! His peaks were very nice, but his power curves were a little lacking. He did have almost 12:1 CR, 3L valves, race cams, and serious head work done though to get such numbers.
He also never had the motor tuned on the dyno.....
dion
98 SVT, 200 whp/190 lb. ft tq (tuned by ADC), 3.0, P&P heads w/2.5L valves, optimized TB, MSDS, SCA 2.5" catback, SHOshop UIM/LIM, underdrive pulley set, TD's, Koni/H&R, BAER/TCE, Progress, CF1 products
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860 |
I'm not sure where my old one is but I should have a new one soon enough. Tonight was 239 and 213 on 91 octane and only 6psi. It was also 95 degree out which didn't help and it was my 56th run for the day.
2001 Lincoln LS8
1994 Lexus GS300
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,786
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,786 |
Originally posted by Keyser: I'm not sure where my old one is but I should have a new one soon enough. Tonight was 239 and 213 on 91 octane and only 6psi. It was also 95 degree out which didn't help and it was my 56th run for the day.
And here is that dyno:
-Auto Mak or-
-Experiment or
-Station Wagon or-
-Computeriz or-
I have a foot that is bigger than a foot.
SuperChipFOR SALE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
The area under the curve for both turbo graphs is just phenomenal, and you really did boost the low-end torque on the latest one!
There is one thing that is starting to disturb me though, and that is the fact that the torque is dropping off rapidly around 6000 rpm. This seems to be independent of the header design since there are two different designs shown here. What is causing it?
Let me lay out the concern I have: Shift points for my SVT when I punch it up to 7 grand are at about 5400 rpm, or somewhere around there. This means that in order to take full advantage of the turbo I would want to shift at about 5900-6000 rpm. If I tach it out to 7 grand then about half of the rev range is not going to have consistent power. I suppose shifting at 6 grand is fine when you have that much torque, but since the engine is capable of another 1000 rpm then you can make more power by shifting the same torque curve further up the rev range.
Things that come to mind: 1. compressor map. perhaps the range on the turbo has been chosen too low. 2. exhaust size. Not as likely in my opinion. 3. intake restriction. Perhaps.
Can you clear this up, or at least describe how you might be dealing with it?
warmonger
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860 |
The torque drop off is an inherit trait of Turbos. Notice how the torque and horsepower don't cross at 5252 like the S/C and N/A cars do? It's just one of those things.
That was only 6.5 on cheap 91 rat gas. Let me turn up the timing a bit and add some boost and see what I come up with.
2001 Lincoln LS8
1994 Lexus GS300
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,469
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,469 |
Originally posted by Keyser: The torque drop off is an inherit trait of Turbos. Notice how the torque and horsepower don't cross at 5252 like the S/C and N/A cars do? It's just one of those things.
I believe that the crossing of HP/T at 5250 RPM is mathamatically determined..5250 is the denominator in the equation which predicts this...what is that equation guys? Maybe the graph is screwed up?
1999 Amazon Green SVT Contour (#554/2760)
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."
-Soren Kierkegaard (as posted by Jato)
|
|
|
|
|