Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#430864 09/07/02 12:08 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,020
F
Hard-core CEG\'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
F
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,020
What a difference! Just installed some gutted and bored out secondaries and it made a pretty noticable difference. They were bored out to 36.5 mm and all the rods, butterflies, etc. have been removed.

1turbofocus did the machine work and has a jig set up to do the duratech secondaries. So if you are interested, he can do them.

From the prelimainary test drive it feels like about 10 hp.

All you boosted guys NEED to do this.

Two thumbs up from me


Simon new- '04 Dodge Dakota 4x4. V8, 5spd FOR SALE Black 98 SVT EO (#2119 of 6535)- SOLD! New project-'88 Ranger 302 swap.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 339
B
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
B
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 339
How much does he charge for the service? Thanks.

Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 196
C
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
C
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 196
now just put it on the dyno so we can see some numbers.


E0 T-Red SVT '98 S\/T K.I.A 6/14/02 AIM: p0lskipimp
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
yeah, since he is closer than SS, can he put the bigger butter flies in too?


Ryan Trollin!
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,020
F
Hard-core CEG\'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
F
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,020
I will ask Tom about the above ?'s when he gets back from the Fun Ford event. I should be able to talk to him early next week.

For now I can only say that the gutted secondaries work for forced induction motors. From discussions on this board it has been said that gutting the secondaries may not be a good mod to do on normally aspirated cars. You will lose alot of low end power for a small amout on the top end.

I will post back here when I find the answers to these questions.


Simon new- '04 Dodge Dakota 4x4. V8, 5spd FOR SALE Black 98 SVT EO (#2119 of 6535)- SOLD! New project-'88 Ranger 302 swap.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
I'm not really looking at getting rid of the secondaries, just opening htem up a bit like SS does.


Ryan Trollin!
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
I see a big problem with going past 34-34.5mm (99 & 00 SVT's only - others smaller yet)

Why you ask?
The head ports are only that large!
Since the head ports would now be smaller than the LIM they would create a very disruptive ridge (atleast 2.5mm) protruding into the incoming airflow.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 339
B
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
B
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 339
I'm not worried about that. I need somone to modify the unique 95 lower manifold to at least late SVT specs.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
that's why you get the heads / headers port matched! :-P

Originally posted by DemonSVT:
I see a big problem with going past 34-34.5mm (99 & 00 SVT's only - others smaller yet)

Why you ask?
The head ports are only that large!
Since the head ports would now be smaller than the LIM they would create a very disruptive ridge (atleast 2.5mm) protruding into the incoming airflow.


Ryan Trollin!
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
that's why you get the heads / headers port matched! :-P


I whole-heartedly agree. Thus making this NOT a simple bolt-on upgrade.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5