|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178
Moderator
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178 |
Just curious what kind of power they are putting out at the wheels.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 956
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 956 |
I wanna know that too.....
Anyone has it ???
** CT - USA **
* 96 Contour Gl 2.0
5 Speed Manual / Clarion CD Change
8" Subwoofer & Sony Amp (LOUD !!)
The Cleanest !!!
* 92 Mazda Protege
5 Speed Manual / 1.8
* 94 Yamaha Virago 535
(better than Viagra !!)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7 |
110 hp, 112 lbs. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178
Moderator
|
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657 |
With a few mods that would be at the wheels...stock at the crank is rated 130 roughly. Damn drivetrain loss. I'll probably have to have my car dyno tuned after my turbo. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178
Moderator
|
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178 |
With the 20% loss that the powertrain usually takes. That takes it to 104 hp at the wheels.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,523
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,523 |
Perhaps we can hope the 'tour tranny is more efficient than most. 
125.2 FWHP - 126.5 FWTQ
SVT exhaust (#4 of 9) - B&M FPR - Custom CAI - bnoon optimized TB #1 & 2 (beat that!!)
Black '98.5 SE Zetec MTX
Best quote seen in a chat - "Jinx 12345678910 you owe me a naked picture of yourself!"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178
Moderator
|
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178 |
I wonder how much the SVT exhaust adds.......
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657 |
Originally posted by D Davis:
we can hope Thats about all we can do. Unfortunately it does have about a 20% loss. Its my understanding that actual % loss varies from one transmission to another...slightly varies anyway. I may be wrong though.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178
Moderator
|
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178 |
Right you are Brad. The 20% is average.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657 |
I'd like to know about the exhaust too. I'm wondering what the extreme decrease in back pressure did for the actual performance numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178
Moderator
|
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178 |
It seems to add quite a bit. But that may just be me.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657 |
I wonder how you figure the actual % for your specific car? You'd almost have to know the hp at the wheels and at the crank...as seperate measures.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178
Moderator
|
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178 |
Using the 110 figure above it would be about 15% roughly.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,248
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,248 |
Guys, look at the CTA dynos by Chris Wong linked on this forum. ZX2 and ZX3 Zetec dynos. Stock about 103 FWHP, with KKM 106 FWHP, with CTA intake + ignition 109 FWHP or so I think. Torque 112 - 118 or so, pretty decent.
1999 Amazon Green SVT Contour (#554/2760)
Stock SVT Duratec V6 with:
Intake- K&N filter/75mm MAF meter
Exhaust- MSDS Y-pipe/Bassani catback
Durability-Ford "dual mode" damper, Mobil 1/K&N oil filter
179.2 FWHP at 6900 RPM
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178
Moderator
|
|
OP
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178 |
well my 104 number wasn't to far off then.
|
|
|
|
|
