Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1639213 09/01/06 12:01 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
C
cuda06 Offline OP
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
C
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
What would be your preference between a porsche 944(n/a) or a bmw 320i for an occasional street driven vehicle but mostly just an autox toy?
Also, does anyone know the classing of these off the top of their head?

Last edited by cuda06; 09/01/06 12:04 AM.

99 csvt 68 cuda fastback 340 00 gp gtp (wife) 01 gs500
#1639214 09/01/06 12:56 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
A
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
A
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
The 944 is fairly competitve in ES, and I've always wanted one. I'm assuming you mean an E21 (late seventies) 320i - that's cool, but really old. I'd rather go all out and get a 2002 or else get an E30 (I'm going to, actually ). Niether is competitive in stock form. A 318ti can do okay in H (G?) stock.


-Philip Maynard '95 Contour [71 STS | Track Whore] '97 Miata [71 ES | Boulevard Pimp] 2006 autocross results
#1639215 09/01/06 01:12 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
C
cuda06 Offline OP
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
C
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
Yeah, the 320 is actually a 79 and the 944 is a package deal for two, one 84 and one 85. Do you know if the classing is the same for all n/a 944s or does it change for the later ones and the 944s?


99 csvt 68 cuda fastback 340 00 gp gtp (wife) 01 gs500
#1639216 09/01/06 01:19 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
C
cuda06 Offline OP
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
C
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
I am leaning toward the 944s for one because it is a great deal and also because one of the more regular participants here runs an 83 fairly well. Its always good to have some sort of a base from another's experience.


99 csvt 68 cuda fastback 340 00 gp gtp (wife) 01 gs500
#1639217 09/01/06 01:44 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
Originally posted by cuda06:
I am leaning toward the 944s for one because it is a great deal and also because one of the more regular participants here runs an 83 fairly well. Its always good to have some sort of a base from another's experience.




I'd snap up a 320 in a minute, but as Phil said, they are not competitive in stock form. Low power and lots of body roll. Good sedan platform on which to build, though, and cool in a bastard-child sort of way. Easy engine swaps (so I've read) from later BMWs, and suspension can always be upgraded. Wheels surprisingly goofy, though, IIRC.

But, given the choice, there's no comparison. 944 all the way. Better power and handling out of the box, and just nicer looking to boot. Parts can be expensive, but most of the "high mx cost" is from labor hours--some mundane wear parts are hard to get to (e.g., the water pump), but if you do your own wrenching and it's not your DD, it won't be so bad.


Function before fashion. '96 Contour SE "Toss the Contour into a corner, and it's as easy to catch as a softball thrown by a preschooler." -Edmunds, 1998
#1639218 09/01/06 11:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 72
S
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
S
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 72
One of my sons had an 80 320i. I liked it but it had a lot of frame rot that I hear was typical. Less power than my wife's Saturn but a full Recaro interior.


John Alessi Torredor Red #1915 of 2150 Born 27Jan2000 G/S No serious mods allowed 1986 SVO Mustang
#1639219 09/02/06 07:39 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 533
1
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
1
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 533
i used to have a 924s (virtually identicle to a pre84' 944); highly suggest a later 944 (go for a turbo if you do!). so damn reliable and so much fun.

ALSO!

might want to look into a 914. BEFORE you look away see if you can get a drive. i was recently talking with a 914-6 owner who has had many porsches and thinks this one is still the most fun for some reason.

-a


koni kit - hpp rstb camber/plates - cf (yikes!) polyroll resistors - TCA's WR headers/ypipe -TB hiflow cat SFC's - XCal2 -dreaming of 3L-
#1639220 09/05/06 12:55 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
Originally posted by 111R:
i used to have a 924s (virtually identicle to a pre84' 944); highly suggest a later 944 (go for a turbo if you do!). so damn reliable and so much fun.

ALSO!

might want to look into a 914. BEFORE you look away see if you can get a drive. i was recently talking with a 914-6 owner who has had many porsches and thinks this one is still the most fun for some reason.

-a




914s are scoffed at by so-called "purists," but then so are 924s, so who cares? Trouble is, a 914-6 in decent condition is going to run you. Same with a 951. Even the 914-4s are running high these days, unless they are "projects."

An N/A 944, 924S, or 320i are all going to be in a similar price range--924S perhaps the best bang for buck of the three, and a better autocrosser to boot (lighter than a 944).


Function before fashion. '96 Contour SE "Toss the Contour into a corner, and it's as easy to catch as a softball thrown by a preschooler." -Edmunds, 1998
#1639221 09/05/06 05:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 562
D
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
D
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 562
968, 50/50 weight distribution FTW!


'99 Spruce Green SE "Sport" 'Tour, 2.5L MTX...80K and running like it just rolled off the lot. Tryin' to add an extra .5L ASAP

Moderated by  Auto-X Fil 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5