Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,882
I
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
I
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,882
Originally posted by Toadster:
Originally posted by IRingTwyce:
Is this the 32M you're calculating?

I really expected more from my comp.

36m 56.157s

P4 641 Prescot @ 3.2 ghz w/ 1 gig DDR2 mem.

SuperPI says only 268 meg mem is allocated though. Might try running it again later on a fresh reboot. I had multiple windows open and was still browsing and working while it ran.




32M? nope - just run the 1M test, that's usually quick (well, most folks here are around a minute) - 17 seconds is pretty darned fast



I missed where you said that in the original post. In that case, I get 42.250s. I feel MUCH better now! I still think I can do better on a fresh boot.

**EDIT** Fresh reboot and killing off some background programs netted a tiny speed boost. Got me down to 41.781s Nothing close to your crazy 17 second run, but better than every AMD that's run it so far. Guitarman's AMD 64 3400 has been the closest.

Last edited by IRingTwyce; 08/31/06 11:19 PM.

BrApple-its all in the way it is presented...but everythign on my resume is all me TexasRealtor-I hope you spelling improves on your resume. MxRacer-ladies and gentlemen, welcome to ironyville. population, texasrelator.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,889
R
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
R
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,889
Originally posted by TourDeForce:
Originally posted by RT and his SE:
48.89 Athlon 2400 M overclocked to 2.4Ghz.




Faster than my P4 3.4 machine. Go figure...?




All of your P4's are belonging to us!


99 Contour Sport SE MTX KKM filter, B&M shifter No res, BAT kit Green car silver hood (because silver is faster)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,882
I
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
I
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,882
Originally posted by RT and his SE:
Originally posted by TourDeForce:
Originally posted by RT and his SE:
48.89 Athlon 2400 M overclocked to 2.4Ghz.




Faster than my P4 3.4 machine. Go figure...?




All of your P4's are belonging to us!



Not mine!

TourDeForce - did you have a lot of applications and processes running when you tried? I still had 32 processes running, but no applications, and hit 41.781s. Mine is a P4 3.2, I'd think you could do better than a 49s+ time.


BrApple-its all in the way it is presented...but everythign on my resume is all me TexasRealtor-I hope you spelling improves on your resume. MxRacer-ladies and gentlemen, welcome to ironyville. population, texasrelator.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816
B
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
B
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816
Originally posted by Toadster:
Originally posted by Big Daddy Kane:
First of all, it is not fair to compare my two systems. The AMD was a mid-speed computer in 2000/2001, however, you can compare them to similar systems.

First up, my laptop with the following important specs:
  • 1.6GHz Pentium M w/2MB L2 cache overclocked to 2.13GHz via pinmod
  • 2,048MB (2GB) of PC4200 DDR2 RAM
  • 533MHz FSB


  • Now my desktop:
  • 1.4GHz Athlon Thunderbird (last of the non PR rated CPUs)
  • 1,024MB (1GB) of PC3200 DDR RAM
  • 266MHz FSB


  • You can compare the results of each to the following setups:

    Laptop:
  • Supposedly a ~2.0GHz Pentium M is faster than a 3.2GHz Pentium 4 with HT disabled. So you could compare this to an Athlon that is PR rated at "3200" I suppose.

    Desktop:
  • The first PR rated Athlons was the Athlon XP "1800" 1.5GHz. So I suppose you could compare my 1.4GHz T-bird to a 1.7GHz Pentium 4.

    Oh, and I forgot to mention, supposedly Pentium Ms are horrible with floating point calculations, so I had better see some Athlon "3200"s beating my laptop!




  • no need to run the 32M test (unless you want to wait for it) - just try the 1M test, that's usually the standard size

    you can also try PiFAST - it's much MUCH faster - i can calculate 1,000,000 iterations in 1.43seconds




    Ach so!

    With that information, I ran another test on each machine at 1M and changed the pictures.


    Goin' Round Traffic Circles @ 50Km/h!!! \m/ -- 1998 E0 SVT #2119 of 6535 \m/ -- 2003 Sentra SE-R Spec V
    Joined: Dec 2001
    Posts: 777
    C
    Veteran CEG\'er
    Offline
    Veteran CEG\'er
    C
    Joined: Dec 2001
    Posts: 777
    The linux version...
    Code:

    vector:/usr/local/src/superPi %./pi 20
    Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
    Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
    f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
    pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
    compilation.
    ------ Started super_pi run : Thu Aug 31 20:27:33 EDT 2006
    Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
    End of initialization. Time= 0.750 Sec.
    I= 1 L= 0 Time= 2.260 Sec.
    I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.630 Sec.
    I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.650 Sec.
    I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.600 Sec.
    I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.600 Sec.
    I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.590 Sec.
    I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.610 Sec.
    I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.610 Sec.
    I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.620 Sec.
    I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.620 Sec.
    I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.600 Sec.
    I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.620 Sec.
    I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.610 Sec.
    I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.580 Sec.
    I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.610 Sec.
    I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.560 Sec.
    I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.560 Sec.
    I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.490 Sec.
    I=19 L= 89415 Time= 2.340 Sec.
    End of main loop
    End of calculation. Time= 51.640 Sec.
    End of data output. Time= 0.180 Sec.
    Total calculation(I/O) time= 51.820( 6.830) Sec



    CPU:
    Code:

    vector:/usr/local/src/superPi %cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
    cpu family : 6
    model : 10
    model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+
    stepping : 0
    cpu MHz : 2079.543
    cache size : 512 KB
    fdiv_bug : no
    hlt_bug : no
    f00f_bug : no
    coma_bug : no
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 1
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up ts
    bogomips : 4162.75




    >--------------< --Chemguru 99 CSVT Frost /Mid. Blue 00 Suzuki SV650 Red, Naked
    Joined: Aug 2000
    Posts: 3,193
    Z
    Hard-core CEG\'er
    Offline
    Hard-core CEG\'er
    Z
    Joined: Aug 2000
    Posts: 3,193
    Originally posted by TBoomer:
    36.969 on a Core Duo 1.8




    I wounder why mine's 3 seconds faster with the same chip.


    Brad "Diva": 2004 Mazda 6s 5-door, Volcanic Red Rex: 1988 Mazda RX-7 Vert, Harbor Blue.
    Joined: Mar 2003
    Posts: 7,117
    T
    Hard-core CEG'er
    Offline
    Hard-core CEG'er
    T
    Joined: Mar 2003
    Posts: 7,117
    Originally posted by IRingTwyce:
    Originally posted by RT and his SE:
    Originally posted by TourDeForce:
    Originally posted by RT and his SE:
    48.89 Athlon 2400 M overclocked to 2.4Ghz.




    Faster than my P4 3.4 machine. Go figure...?




    All of your P4's are belonging to us!



    Not mine!

    TourDeForce - did you have a lot of applications and processes running when you tried? I still had 32 processes running, but no applications, and hit 41.781s. Mine is a P4 3.2, I'd think you could do better than a 49s+ time.




    Ya, I had the browser running and Outlook up as well. Same for my AMD machine at home which is also running fire wall, anti virus, game control software & a few others - I just ran:

    AMD Athlon 64 3000+ with 2Meg of RAM

    46.371s

    I expected my AMD machine to be faster. It is always faster than my work computer when running the same software & manipulating the same drawing & GIS files.

    The power of 64, I guess.


    Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
    Joined: Aug 2000
    Posts: 2,882
    T
    Highly Medicated Member
    Offline
    Highly Medicated Member
    T
    Joined: Aug 2000
    Posts: 2,882
    48.906


    P4 3.0GHz
    1.0 GB Ram


    Semper Fi "They've got us surrounded. Poor bastards." -Chesty
    Joined: May 2000
    Posts: 1,228
    T
    Hard-core CEG\'er
    OP Offline
    Hard-core CEG\'er
    T
    Joined: May 2000
    Posts: 1,228
    btw - i ran mine without turning off any services


    '04 Mazda6S MTX Injen CAI, 18% Tint, Magnaflow Catback, CPE-MAFc My Mazda6 PICS Toadster's Website
    Joined: Jul 2003
    Posts: 1,882
    I
    Hard-core CEG\'er
    Offline
    Hard-core CEG\'er
    I
    Joined: Jul 2003
    Posts: 1,882
    Originally posted by Toadster:
    btw - i ran mine without turning off any services





    BrApple-its all in the way it is presented...but everythign on my resume is all me TexasRealtor-I hope you spelling improves on your resume. MxRacer-ladies and gentlemen, welcome to ironyville. population, texasrelator.
    Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

    Link Copied to Clipboard
    Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5