Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#1627856 08/15/06 05:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 140
G
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
G
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 140
Originally posted by MaddMike2:
Dyno #5


should work now




Call me a 'facilitator', in hopes of this thread going somewhere.



Grabbed from FCO (f*ck the reg process is a PITA, scaled to fit to screen).

Nay say away (and leave me out of it).


-------------------- 1999 Black/Tan CSVT #2658 of 2760 201,000+km - K&N, Magnecor race wires, Optima red top, BAT Euro Kit, KVR CF pads, PIAA Plasma Ion bulbs. 1989 Yamaha FZR600 - 40,000+km - K&N Pods, Stage 3 Jets, V&H 4-1 exhaust
#1627857 08/15/06 06:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Well, they look like SE cams to me from the dyno.

Irregardless of the actual numbers there appears to be a solid gain between the first dyno and the second dyno throughout the powerband.

This is about what would happen to a car if it were dyno'd on a 70 degree day versus a 90 degree day without temperature corrections on the plots.
It could also be something like a better intake...maybe a cold-air intake or to someone tuning a better air fuel ratio.


Doh! You said you used some sort of forced air system to simulate a ram-air. That totally explains it to me because there is now more air in the cylinders due to less intake restriction.

Putting an intake into practice that can actually provide this kind of airflow at all times is the real challenge.

Actually its the same principle behind a turbo system except on a much smaller scale.


Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
#1627858 08/15/06 11:24 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 177
M
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
M
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 177
Thanks for posting the Dyno sheet, as for posting pics of the exhaust I have not been able to borrow a digital cam yet.

To see what the front at the manifolds looks like go to BAT Inc, web site and look at their Y-pipe, mine is very much like it. They claim 8-10 HP increase with just the Y-pipe. With the right muffler and the different routing of the exhaust 4hp more on top of that is not an unreasonable gain. Also now that the exhaust is more open the SVT computers tune maybe working better.


98 Tropic Green Contour 2.5 MTX
#1627859 08/17/06 07:27 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651
H
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
H
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651
Originally posted by MaddMike2:
Thanks for posting the Dyno sheet, as for posting pics of the exhaust I have not been able to borrow a digital cam yet.

To see what the front at the manifolds looks like go to BAT Inc, web site and look at their Y-pipe, mine is very much like it. They claim 8-10 HP increase with just the Y-pipe. With the right muffler and the different routing of the exhaust 4hp more on top of that is not an unreasonable gain. Also now that the exhaust is more open the SVT computers tune maybe working better.





Um your y-pipe probably added 4 hp casue u still have a main cat. And 3 hp from a catback with new muffler.

7 hp the most!!


I reject your reality and substitute my own.
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  mbb41_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5