Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
#1584457 06/06/06 03:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Then convert over the heads to fit the Lower Intake manifold. So much easier that Fkkn with all that other stuff, fuel rail included. Two hours of your time also saves a lot of money.

For a quality engine, $600-$1000 shipped. Gaskets $200, only if you replace every single thing. I've told people often enough that all you need is new head, pan and timing cover gaskets at a minimum. I say this because you don't want to pull something in that area apart later. Obviously you inspect the valve cover gaskets for pliability, and other o-rings/gaskets like on the intakes. If they are still pliable and in good shape, reuse them. If they eventually go bad, changing them on this engine is easy at that point.

You will want to replace the rod bearings with clevite77 and that means a set of rod bolts (about $100 total), but you won't need to do the mains (never been a main bearing issue). This gives you a chance to pull each piston assembly for inspection. You can carefully remove the rings, clean them and the grooves, clean the pistons up then lube everything and reassemble. This is the time you decide if you need new rings or not.

No need to worry about pulling the mains as I said, and then you can have confidence in your new engine.

As far as the heads, I posted how easy it is to convert to fit stock contour intakes and it makes it sooooo much easier for future work too.
You don't need to worry about non-standard parts everywhere else, and if you have SVT PCM it will even run a 3L just like stock only a lot better.
So you probably won't need a tune for a while. Then of course you can do some porting on the heads to improve flow if necessary.

And if I didn't mention it, all valve covers, timing covers, fuel rails, everything just bolts right back up at that point like stock. Unless you are a perfectionist with a 3L drop in, this will guarantee higher reliability in the long run.

Just FYI, $1700 with me doing the labor gave me a 3L with worked heads producing 217 wHP. After exhaust, headers and an emanage, $2500 later I had a great, tuneable car. Of course now the xcal2 is better and only a little more than an emanage.


Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
#1584458 06/07/06 07:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
W
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
W
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
You have found more blown up Miatae than Contours? I simply can't believe that.


Whirling dervish of FFOG.
#1584459 06/07/06 09:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
A
Hard-core CEG\'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
A
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
I have found more Miatas with short-nose crank or other issues than V-6, 5-speed, 4-bolt LCA Contours with blown engines. Contours in general are more common, but 5-speed V-6 cars are really hard to find.

Plus, there are Miatas on craigslist within a 4-5 hour radius of me every day that need engines. People throw away blown Contours, while Miatas hold enough value (and hold together well enough) to be worth selling.

Try looking for a car. I've found eight Miata project cars that tempted me in the last month. I've been looking for the right Contour for two years and never found one close to me. The ones I find are auto, 4-cyl, rusted out, or just disgusting.


-Philip Maynard '95 Contour [71 STS | Track Whore] '97 Miata [71 ES | Boulevard Pimp] 2006 autocross results
#1584460 06/21/06 03:13 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
W
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
W
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
So you mean only the early now 15+ year old 1.6s. Gotcha.

You should do a *real* 3L Locost. That would be sweet.


Whirling dervish of FFOG.
#1584461 06/21/06 03:45 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
T
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
T
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
Thanks for the unnecessary post revival.


-'96 SE MTX 3L -'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535 -'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride -Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
#1584462 06/22/06 02:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
W
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
W
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
Originally posted by todras:
Thanks for the unnecessary post revival.




You're welcome. Next time, I'll start another one and make searches even more ridiculous.


Whirling dervish of FFOG.
#1584463 06/22/06 02:58 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,621
B
Redneck Troll
Offline
Redneck Troll
B
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,621
Originally posted by warmonger:
, but you won't need to do the mains (never been a main bearing issue). <snip>

No need to worry about pulling the mains as I said, and then you can have confidence in your new engine.




I disagree with this part of the post. When my 2.5 spit it's rod bearing, I severely hurt two mains as well (though they didn't spin). Even in a budget build, I would pull the mains and inspect them at a minimum, even if I didn't want to replace the bearings. A few more bucks for the TTY main bolts is worth every penny.

$525 delivered for my 3L engine and a couple hun for the bolts/gaskets I needed, I had my 3L swapped in myself for under 800 bucks. How's that for "Locost"???

It put down 180/180 whp/wtq at SZ with a crappy stock SE UIM, a check engine light, a leaking exhaust manifold, running way rich on 24# FMS injectors, and no tune. When I swapped in the ported 3L aluminum UIM, I never got it dynoed again, but I KNOW it was a HUGE increase in performance over the stock SE UIM and didn't cost me a thing but time. I really wish I would have dynoed it though... It would have been above 200 WHP, I just know it!


http://www.bnmotorsports.com "And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my CEG brothers. And you will know I am the Moderator when I lay my vengeance upon you."
#1584464 06/22/06 05:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
A
Hard-core CEG\'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
A
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
Originally posted by weargle:
So you mean only the early now 15+ year old 1.6s. Gotcha.

You should do a *real* 3L Locost. That would be sweet.




No, I mean all Miatas. It's not that Miatas fail more, it's that a huge majority of Miatas are good project cars while most Contours are not.

I've been thinking about that. Is there a longitudinal transaxle that will mate to the Duratecs? I was thinking about telling a friend to throw a turbo 3L in his RX-7. He's looking for an unusual swap. I'm afraid a blown 3800 might work better due to packaging and tranny choice, though.


-Philip Maynard '95 Contour [71 STS | Track Whore] '97 Miata [71 ES | Boulevard Pimp] 2006 autocross results
#1584465 06/22/06 07:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
W
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
W
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
Originally posted by Auto-X Fil:
Originally posted by weargle:
So you mean only the early now 15+ year old 1.6s. Gotcha.

You should do a *real* 3L Locost. That would be sweet.




No, I mean all Miatas. It's not that Miatas fail more, it's that a huge majority of Miatas are good project cars while most Contours are not.

I've been thinking about that. Is there a longitudinal transaxle that will mate to the Duratecs? I was thinking about telling a friend to throw a turbo 3L in his RX-7. He's looking for an unusual swap. I'm afraid a blown 3800 might work better due to packaging and tranny choice, though.




Lincoln LS Gecrap manual mates up. You'll need a custom driveshaft. There is a 3L Miata out there set up this way. Or, go with something beefier and adapt a T5. Googling can find the guy that made a custom plate.

The short nose crank issue was *only* on early 1.6Ls. Seeing as how the B6ZE engines were also used in the 323 GTX, I don't see why there was such a failure rate when there wasn't one in that turbocharged application. This is null on the 1.8L BP05.


Whirling dervish of FFOG.
#1584466 06/23/06 12:16 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Well, you are entitled to your opinion...this once.

Not bad advice by any means but I have to point out that if there was obvious damage to an engine as from bad rods then I'd check everything out. I only meant on a good low miles runner I'd leave the mains alone. Low miles being less than 25-30K...obviously less, not one of those that looks like it had 200K that the junkyard sells claiming it has 500 miles on it. lol


Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  bnoon_dup1, PA 3L SVT_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5