Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#1563905 05/03/06 09:44 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
J
J3SVT Offline OP
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
J
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
Recently, Carpepoon and I have been PMing back and forth to decide the best bass set up for me. He talked me in to getting a rear deck sub and I think I would like to get an 8" subwoofer to do the job. My question is, I have a Pioneer GM-X722 amplifier and an Alpine CDA-9811 Head Unit. What sub driver should i get that would be most compatible to the amplifier. So far, i've looked at

MTX

MTX Audio Thunder5500 T5508-04
MTX Audio Thunder5500 T5508-44

and a kicker model, can't remember exact model number, CMB8?

And for those using eDead for their sound damping, how do you like it? What have you used it on? and which version did you use where?

Last question...would it be worth it to use my 4 channel legacy amplifier 4X100 MAX, not sure rms, to power the speakers also? is it possible? would the signal from the head unit be strong enough and how would one go about wiring that if it were/could be done?

Thanks in advance for replys.

Josh


98' Black SVT Build #1915 of 6535
#1563906 05/03/06 10:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
C
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
C
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
Josh, sorry I've been slacking on the PM's. I only get a couple chances to check my computer durring the day for purposes other than work when I'm not out in the field. I guess since this is now a post I'll just post here as well. The kicker speakers you posted in the PM are actually mid-bass drivers, not subwoofers. Any subwoofer will work in a rear deck free-air invironment but when a sub is mounted free air it only requires about 1/4 the power it would typically require if it were in an enclosure.. so you will have to be careful when setting the gain on your amp.
Certain subs are better than others... I'll let the techinical gurus chime in here to let you the specifics of what you should look for.
as for the last question, you have 3 sets of RCA pre-outs on your headunit CDA 9811 correct?. front/rear and sub.. your 4 channel amp would hook up to your front/rear outputs while your sub amplifier would hook up to the sub pre-out.. so you would just need 3 sets of RCA cables... no weak signal worries.


2000 SVT Black/Tan #1633/2150 (a few mods) Alpine: CDA-9835, MRV-F540, MRD-M550 PG: TANTRUM-X 6.5 COMP all around. Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas. CEL currently: Off
#1563907 05/04/06 04:44 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
J
J3SVT Offline OP
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
J
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
thanks brent...any gurus willing to help out there?


98' Black SVT Build #1915 of 6535
#1563908 05/04/06 10:49 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
J
J3SVT Offline OP
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
J
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
so the MTX Audio Thunder5500 T5508-04 would be a good subwoofer match for the amplifier i would like to use...Pioneer GM-X722? And would i just run one remote wire back from the head unit for 2 amplifiers?


98' Black SVT Build #1915 of 6535
#1563909 05/04/06 11:55 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 626
G
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
G
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 626
i'll soon be upgrading my rear deck sub to an Eclipse SW8102.4

it's gonna be


What do you mean, rhetorical question? 1998.5 SVT --> http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2155561/1 #4619 of 6535, born Feb 18, 1998. i'm a smarta$$, don't take it personally
#1563910 05/05/06 03:07 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,281
S
Captain Impound Boy
Offline
Captain Impound Boy
S
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,281
why???

#1563911 05/05/06 04:44 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
J
J3SVT Offline OP
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
J
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 299
Originally posted by GreaseyMonkey:
i'll soon be upgrading my rear deck sub to an Eclipse SW8102.4

it's gonna be




thanks for that...

does anybody know if that subwoofer would be suitable with that amplifier...and should i hook up the amp at one or two channels?


98' Black SVT Build #1915 of 6535
#1563912 05/05/06 12:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 46
1
New CEG\'er
Offline
New CEG\'er
1
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 46
the mtx 8" 4500 4ohm model is just fine for a free air rear deck sub. you dont want more than that unless you want to tear the whole rear deck apart to put in support and sound deadening material. as far as the amp i dont know the output of it so it may be to much for the sub but if you want the most power bridge the 2 channels together- posiitive from ch.1 and negative from ch.2. find out the output of your amp before you hook all this up as the mtx 8 only needs 100-150 watts to be optimal

#1563913 05/05/06 02:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 626
G
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
G
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 626
Originally posted by Decepticon:
why???




cuz i've got waaayyy too much power going to the TM3.
i've been reading up on the eclipse, it's not only a crazy sub to begin with, it's perfect for my amp.
i've seriously got about double the rms going into the tm3 right now.
not good, the way i listen

if you want i can sell it back to you


What do you mean, rhetorical question? 1998.5 SVT --> http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2155561/1 #4619 of 6535, born Feb 18, 1998. i'm a smarta$$, don't take it personally
#1563914 05/05/06 02:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
C
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
C
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
I think his amp is 240 x 1 @ 4ohms bridged IIRC


2000 SVT Black/Tan #1633/2150 (a few mods) Alpine: CDA-9835, MRV-F540, MRD-M550 PG: TANTRUM-X 6.5 COMP all around. Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas. CEL currently: Off
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  dnewma04_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5