|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872
Addicted CEG\'er
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872 |
Originally posted by KingpinSVT:
It should. ALWAYS!
yea exactly!
this thread is confusing.. 
#0009
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,445
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,445 |
Originally posted by Goonz SVT:
Originally posted by supertouringmike:
Originally posted by Y2KSVT:
Originally posted by RawBurt:
Originally posted by supertouringmike:
Koni kit and 18"ers on!
No aligment problems...
No rubbing either......
x2
How are you verifying no allignment issues? Allignment rack? Eyeballing it?
Mark
Alignment shop! Drives OK.
weeeeeird! 
I thought any suspension change should be followed by an allignment! hmm
is that better goonie?  
NY State Trooper: So what makes your car so special to have SVT all over it?
Me: Er...It was made by Fords SPECIAL Vehicle Team?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872 |
Originally posted by Me ted:
Originally posted by Goonz SVT:
Originally posted by supertouringmike:
Originally posted by Y2KSVT:
Originally posted by RawBurt:
Originally posted by supertouringmike:
Koni kit and 18"ers on!
No aligment problems...
No rubbing either......
x2
How are you verifying no allignment issues? Allignment rack? Eyeballing it?
Mark
Alignment shop! Drives OK.
weeeeeird!
I thought any suspension change should be followed by an allignment! hmm
is that better goonie?
I know that but this thread seems to state otherwise
#0009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
