|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130 |
Originally posted by Who the F are You?: does your family tree not have any branches on it?
99SVT
235hp @ 6550rpm
212tq @ 5350rpm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 351
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 351 |
Nice numbers you got there Randy. I too would like to see that a lot richer. Spiking to 14:1 on a nitrous shot is a little scary on stock internals. You might need to up your injectors to keep up with the nitrous. It looks like there are reaching their limits towards the higher end. I'll talk to you more about it later. Give me a call when you get a chance. I'm up late normally. Laterz!
Robert
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140 |
That torque curve is amazing. It looks like a very fun engine to rev out. Aside from the 14.0:1, that's pretty solid!
I hope the operator was guessing at 3600lbs!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Randy,
Very nice runs!
The spike towards 14:1 is a result of the secondaries opening and introducing more air before the MAF compensates. Notice it is present in the NA run but becomes more exacerbated with the nitrous. The nitrous is adding more O2 after the maf so it is not being compensated for by the stock computer. Is this a WET kit or DRY?
Either way it shouldn't present a problem. It can be richened up a tiny bit there I'd guess.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130 |
It is a zex dry kit.
Robsvt-t and I thought it might also be due to nitrous pooling at the secondaries, and being quickly introduced when they open up. Whatever it may be my tune could use some richening up at that point. I was really surprised to see higher horsepower using your nitrous tune. You tune had the timing retarded for a 100 shot, and I figured that would equal less horsepower than a dry shot on stock (more advanced) timing.
Originally posted by Who the F are You?: does your family tree not have any branches on it?
99SVT
235hp @ 6550rpm
212tq @ 5350rpm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860 |
13:1 on nitrous is a really, really bad idea. Add fuel...soon. Closer to 11:1 would be much better.
2001 Lincoln LS8
1994 Lexus GS300
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by Keyser: 13:1 on nitrous is a really, really bad idea. Add fuel...soon. Closer to 11:1 would be much better.
That all depends if the A/F info is tail pipe or post manifold.
12.8ish is a tad lean for a tail pipe sniffer but not scary bad.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860 |
Let me rephrase...From my past experience, I have never seen anyone tune their nitrous over 12:1 on a tail pipe sniffer. I have seen quite a few cars dyno with nitrous, but I far from know it all. In my opinion based on what I've seen, I would add fuel.
2001 Lincoln LS8
1994 Lexus GS300
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130 |
the AFR sensor was in the tail pipe.
Originally posted by Who the F are You?: does your family tree not have any branches on it?
99SVT
235hp @ 6550rpm
212tq @ 5350rpm
|
|
|
|
|
|