|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076
Hard-core CEG'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,076 |
I'm assuming thats an intake in the top of the pic. So is this a Mid-engine car?
2000 SVT Black/Tan #1633/2150 (a few mods)
Alpine: CDA-9835, MRV-F540, MRD-M550
PG: TANTRUM-X 6.5 COMP all around.
Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas.
CEL currently: Off
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,089
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,089 |
maybe an audi of some sort. im guessing its a LeMans type car
99 V6SE Sport ATX
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,317
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,317 |
~Ryan
1999 T-Red SVT Contour
41k Miles #1701 / 2760
B&M, Custom Y-Pipe, Alpine HU, Pioneer 6x8's & 6x9's
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,029
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,029 |
Originally posted by CarpePoon: I'm assuming thats an intake in the top of the pic. So is this a Mid-engine car?
I'm with you, but it doesn't LOOK like an intake, it's kinda shaped wierd for that. I know....it's the Batmobile, in optional coral blue metallic,LOL.
Scott
Mabe I WILL be Phil.
1999 Contour SVT, Tropic Green
BAT kit, K&N RU-3530+MAF, Magnecore 8.5mm, some audio goodies, Hightowers, Knauberized, tatoo by Parkedcar.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,317
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,317 |
Originally posted by getsum111: Originally posted by CarpePoon: I'm assuming thats an intake in the top of the pic. So is this a Mid-engine car?
I'm with you, but it doesn't LOOK like an intake, it's kinda shaped wierd for that. I know....it's the Batmobile, in optional coral blue metallic,LOL.
lol
~Ryan
1999 T-Red SVT Contour
41k Miles #1701 / 2760
B&M, Custom Y-Pipe, Alpine HU, Pioneer 6x8's & 6x9's
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777 |
Originally posted by ToasterOven: im guessing its a LeMans type car
going on the right track - ill post another clue later today when I get to the comp that has the pics
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,029
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,029 |
What was the older Mazerati?? that had the "tunnel" going behind the drivers head? Damn, just saw it on TV the other day. Like the old 50's Lemans cars......Hmmmm.
Scott
Mabe I WILL be Phil.
1999 Contour SVT, Tropic Green
BAT kit, K&N RU-3530+MAF, Magnecore 8.5mm, some audio goodies, Hightowers, Knauberized, tatoo by Parkedcar.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 702
Veteran CEG\'er
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 702 |
Originally posted by Horse: ok
Looks Like Something Zora Duntov Designed. Perhaps A 63 Corvette Le Mans Single Seater?? Cant Remember The Exact Name...But Am I Close?
Or How About The Same Decade Ferrari Le Mans Single Seater In The GTB Formula?
Last edited by Pale Horse; 03/23/06 06:47 PM.
CSVT E0 3L
14.5 @ 94mph, Stock Intake, Stock Exhaust minus Resonator, CEL, And Broken Pass. Side CV...Untuned.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 192
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 192 |
Maybe a Cougar C26S GTP car from the mid 90's? If memory serves me correctly, a lot of GTP cars had those rear brake air intakes in the early to mid 90's.
Last edited by spdsk8r; 03/23/06 08:21 PM.
Rick
98 Red CSVT #6 of 6535 Born Nov. 12, 1996
02 Jeep Liberty Limited
79 Datsun 280ZX w/ 355sbc
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,203
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,203 |
Originally posted by Horse: Originally posted by ToasterOven: im guessing its a LeMans type car
going on the right track - ill post another clue later today when I get to the comp that has the pics
Agreed on the LeMans. That little "intake" screams aerodynamic rear mirror to me. As well as the slant of the window and "hood" says a single seater, rear engined car. I don't know LeMans cars whatsoever, they all look the same to me, so I couldn't begin to start guessing as to what it is. Just an observation others might not be seeing, but still could be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|