Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,336
F
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
F
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,336
I think that TH and I are on the same page here. I cut mine to aim directly at the back of the valve ... just like the stock setup because I'm retaining the use of the stock injectors. I guess the better question here is who is aiming at the center and using the stock injectors? If you are, you may not be helping at all and may be hurting your fueling atomization. Now, if you have and you are using the oval port injectors, you are accomplishing what you thought you would when you cut the heads. The key variable here and what Terry is pointing out is that the injector spray pattern is different in the two heads and most people that use the oval port heads and retain the split port injector location reuse their split port injectors.

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Originally posted by fastcougar:
I think that TH and I are on the same page here. I cut mine to aim directly at the back of the valve ... just like the stock setup because I'm retaining the use of the stock injectors. I guess the better question here is who is aiming at the center and using the stock injectors? If you are, you may not be helping at all and may be hurting your fueling atomization. Now, if you have and you are using the oval port injectors, you are accomplishing what you thought you would when you cut the heads. The key variable here and what Terry is pointing out is that the injector spray pattern is different in the two heads and most people that use the oval port heads and retain the split port injector location reuse their split port injectors.




Naaa, The real question is: Who the hell has gone through the trouble to change the injector mounting boss angle in the LIM (not the head) and fuel rail feed nozzle angle enough to allow the injector to be "AIMED" anywhere at all?
None, nada, no one who's gone public anyways.
So who the heck cares? THe purpose of widening out the valley/channel where the injector spray comes out into the head is to give it the best shot possible for fuel to hit the second valve inlet, irregardless of any other issues. If there's metal in the way then the chance of getting fuel to the second valve is low. So use what you've got and hope you get enough over there. If you don't, no worries because it won't be acting any worse than the stock split port system does, which is pretty darn good anyways right????


Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,097
S
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
S
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,097
exactly what tom said....

you can't "aim" the injector...it's gonna spray the same unless you modify the LIM. I just slightly cut mine to right hoping that when my 2ndaries open up...that extra cut will help the air pull a little more fuel to the right.

But I don't think anyone has aimed any injectors anywhere


98 E0 SVT with some stuff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,336
F
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
F
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,336
Thanks for clarifying that Tom ... that is exactly what I was thinking but forgot to mention. When I said "aim", I meant the angeling of the channel, not the injector. It's a given seeing as how the injector is aimed based on it's fixture in the LIM. It would take more than just recutting the LIM, you would have to actually modify the fuel rail as well since the top "cap" has very little deflection or "wiggle" room to "point" the injector face.

Last edited by fastcougar; 03/09/06 03:40 AM.
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087
B
Hard-core CEG\'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
B
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087
So basically what you're saying is that I should be fine, especially if I just grinded the injector lanes on the heads out a tad more?


Matt 2002 Subaru Impreza WRX (WRB Stage 4+) Old Rides: 1999 Sil-Fro SVT Contour 3.0L with goodies (Totalled 6/21/06) 1988 Bronco II (Sold) You know you launch hard when you beat oncoming traffic through their own crosswalk lines.
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
S
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
S
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
You do have room for it.

In it's currant form, it may just disperse the spray pattern a bit more by hitting such a ramp which may help atomisation, and since the A/F mixture is more or less drawn in once the valves open it might not be a bad thing.

Just a theory anyway. It isn't what I did, but it sounds like it could be an option to me.


2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4 1964 Chevrolet Impala SS 1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,336
F
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
F
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,336
I would think that the opposite would be true. Liquid particles that are forced to share the same place normally congile into larger particles ... they "pool" together. Like TH said, it would depend mostly on the velocity of the air in which the particles are being injected. This was my theory and why I made my injector valley as deep and spread out as I could. Mine started out deep and shallow and then bleeds out and expands as it meets the floor of the chamber behind the valve.

Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
T
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
T
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
.....oval port with offset injector is a compromised
system.It's neither a good spray angle for a twin port
as you are now spraying into an oval in an offset
position and not good for an oval as you still have a
secondary,closed,above the second valve with a 'snake'
airflow and lowered velocity.Only a custom injector
with a clocked nozzle head and modded spray angles,2
for the the 'open' lim and 2 to try to traverse the
added distance from the injector across the port to
the second valve may help the poor spray pattern to
the second valve or a two injector system per
cylinder.....the airfow thru one port of the lim is
off when secondaries are closed and the injector spray
position is off when the secodary is open....neither
is good for fuel mixing .The stoc twin port system
injects air fuel to one port all the time,when the
secondary opens all that does is add more air to water
down the over rich mix in the injector port....that
'final' mix happens in the cylinder .The best place to
get this mix right would be in the port,as a stoc
central injector 3.0 does with an oval port.....might
as well weld in a wall to an oval port and call it quits......



-'96 SE MTX 3L -'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535 -'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride -Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
S
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
S
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
OK, this thread has bugged me for a bit now and I have to put in my final word. Take it for what it's worth.

There is much more to porting and mod'ing these heads to do well. Relocating the port injector is simply ONE step in a multi-step process. Relocating the injector port is one of the EASIEST mods to these heads one has to make to put some serious power down with them. There's a ton of other things you have to do to get these to work well! The total amount of time I put into my heads, the injector ports had a tiny fraction of it. Attention is needed elsewhere to pull these multiple modifications off. Look at my dyno proof with a craptastic break in tune for proof, if you need to.

When one is able to produce power in NA or FI form that is simply wicked for this platform to even handle, why would you go to the trouble to retain the center injection port!? If it's that optimal, than go ahead and make a custom LIM and fuel rail to retain it and keep the Aluminum UIM's, or show me an engine in a Contique that has retained the POS plastic UIM/LIM that has made some power worthy of mentioning past a daily driver amount.

As "compromised" as my system is, I'm doing really f$*%ing well


2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4 1964 Chevrolet Impala SS 1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,101
T
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
T
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,101
I ususally don't say this but this puppet posting by TH is getting a bit annoying. If he want's to post here than he should re-join our community.

Every setup is a bit of a compromise unless you have the big $$ to tool up your own castings to you exacting specifications etc. I know my setup isn't 100% perfect but it works well enough for a streetable NA setup. There are certian things I would change if I had the $$ to do so but the gains I would likely see in return would be far less than the total dollars spent to achieve that ultimate number. Also everyone who does this has their own idea of what the ideal setup for them is. For me it was retaining the stock look of the 2.5L engine but also gaining the additional oil drainbacks which should help the longevity of my engine (espically considering the hard track abuse my car will continue to enudure). One thing that I find interesting is that dollar for dollar these poor offset injector locations (as TH claims they are) on the modified oval port heads have for the most part made more HP or at minimum the same HP as ported split port "hybrid" 3L's for less money. Bottom line is everyone makes thier choice of what they want to do for thier build and it is up to them to make the most educated decision as to what the best options are for themselves.


Then: 99 Silver Frost SVT #1919 237hp/219tq All Motor Now: 06 White STI Parts 4 sale
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  bnoon_dup1, PA 3L SVT_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5