Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1519173 03/06/06 04:11 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 54
H
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
H
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 54
Where can I get a set of bigger sway bars for my 98 CSVT?


hotrod90019 98 CSVT T-Red #4463
#1519174 03/06/06 05:31 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,033
G
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
G
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,033
Rear sway bars are easier to come accross....

and the Cougar group just had a group buy for Roush rear sway bars for $75...but their is the same bars on e-bay for I believe $55.

www.spmotorsports.com also has the BAT rear sway bar.


Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently.
#1519175 03/06/06 06:29 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 54
H
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
H
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 54
Thanks!! Any idea where t o find the front?


hotrod90019 98 CSVT T-Red #4463
#1519176 03/06/06 07:37 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Originally posted by hotrod90019:
Thanks!! Any idea where t o find the front?



Why would you want a larger sway bar on the front? The car pushes bad enough with all the weight up there anyway.

The SVT front bar is an upgrade to stock. It's smaller and R&R is a PITA though.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1519177 03/06/06 07:43 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
A
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
A
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
A stiffer front bar would be a great compliment to the Aussie rear bar for softer spring rates like stock, the BAT/Koni kits, etc. But, there are no available bars (there was one from SHOShop, IIRC, but not still made), mostly becaue it's such a huge pain to change them out. If you can find an Addco or "Aussie" bar, those are both very stiff, 21mm bars are a little softer and won't be too much for the stock springs: BAT inc. has one that's very common.

Try searching the forum and reading old posts about what swaybars/suspension setups you might want to go with: there's a lot to be found!


-Philip Maynard '95 Contour [71 STS | Track Whore] '97 Miata [71 ES | Boulevard Pimp] 2006 autocross results
#1519178 03/06/06 08:15 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 54
H
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
H
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 54
Thanks for all the info guys. Good looking out!


hotrod90019 98 CSVT T-Red #4463
#1519179 03/07/06 04:38 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,397
A
b0x @dm1n
Offline
b0x @dm1n
A
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,397
Did you read what Demon said? A bigger front bar is counter productive, it causes to much well hop. Hell a few guys with high end custom setups removed the front bar all together.

-Andy


Andy W. The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
#1519180 03/07/06 07:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
A
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
A
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
I'm not sure about that, Andy. Depending on what kind of tuning you are doing, a softer, stiffer, or no front bar may be best. For street driving, where you want to keep spring rates down but increase roll rate, I think a stiffer front bar could make the car feel great: Focus guys have had a lot of luck with setups like that. Also, if you are tuning for autocross or road-race, a little more front bar may be in order, since everything else will be stiffened dramatically.

If you are driving in competition, then whether to reduce, increase, or eliminate front bar stiffness depends on the setup and specifics of the events. For the street, it again depends on the setup, but I think that a stiff bar might very well be nice. For instance, you could run 400 lb/in coilover springs instead of the 525 lb/in that come with the GC kit, and keep the roll rate up with a stiffer bar.

When tuning bars or springs, it important to remember that nothing works in isolation! Two modifications that each make the car slower or less nimble independantly may work together to improve things!


-Philip Maynard '95 Contour [71 STS | Track Whore] '97 Miata [71 ES | Boulevard Pimp] 2006 autocross results
#1519181 03/07/06 09:53 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,397
A
b0x @dm1n
Offline
b0x @dm1n
A
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,397
I think you are off base comparing what the Focus guys do to us. They have a much more compact and stiff chassis and they have better weight distribution.

I have never seen a handling conscious Contour owner upsize the front bar. Increased mobility does you no good if you can't put an power to the ground.

-Andy


Andy W. The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
#1519182 03/08/06 12:04 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
W
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
W
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 751
Originally posted by Andy W.:
I think you are off base comparing what the Focus guys do to us. They have a much more compact and stiff chassis and they have better weight distribution.

I have never seen a handling conscious Contour owner upsize the front bar. Increased mobility does you no good if you can't put an power to the ground.

-Andy




The rear bar plants the front end, not the front bar. The rule of thumb with swaybars is that they tune the opposite end of the car with respect to where they are installed.

Chassis dynamics really don't differ that much between cars, especially 1FWD cars.


Whirling dervish of FFOG.

Moderated by  Andy W._dup1, Auto-X Fil 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5