Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
#1510584 03/01/06 04:15 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Originally posted by Mod-Deth:
Not in anyway disregarding what was written, but in all probability he's gonna run 225/40/18s on them.

Falken 512's in that size weigh 21.6lbs.

So now the combined weight is 36.6lbs.



True the 512 is an ultralight tire. There are 225/40's that weigh over 28lbs as well. Tire choice plays a large factor in the end results.

Using that 37lb 18" combo it would be.

+35 lbs accelerating
+90 lbs braking

Using a 28lb tire (43lb combo) it would be.

+245 lbs accelerating
+470 lbs braking

Yes tire weight is paramount to this type of calculation.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1510585 03/01/06 06:04 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
K
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
K
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
Gearing changes from different tire sizes will also affect acceleration numbers (to a much lesser degree than weight). Just something to keep in mind (not that you didn't already know Demon).

Here's something neat:
http://the-welters.com/racing/rotational.html


98.5 SVT 91 Escort GT (almost sold) 96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve) FS: SVT rear sway bar WTB: Very cheap beater CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
#1510586 03/01/06 04:39 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 314
B
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
B
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 314
This thread got me thinking and searching for tire weights.

I can't believe the Kumho Ecsta ASX is so nice and light.

Kumho - 23 lbs
Yoko H4S - 25 lbs
Avon M550 A/S - 27 lbs

in 225/45-17.

According to an inertia calc I downloaded, each of those 2 lb increases is like having an extra 60 lbs riding around in your car! Wow.

Are these Ecstas really that light?????? That's a couple pounds lighter than most 16" tires by other brands. Data was from TireRack.

Brian

#1510587 03/04/06 02:22 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816
B
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
B
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Stock E1 = 19.5lbs
225/50 Falkien = 22lbs
Total = 41.5lbs

Your 18" rims = 15lbs
235/35/18 XXX = 25lbs
Total = 40lbs

The E1 Falkien combo requires 14.48 lb/ft of torque (per tire) to rotate and stop rotating.

The 18" combo requires 16.41 lb/ft of torque (per tire) to rotate and stop rotating.




So what you're saying is... these are not a good choice for my lawnmower? Because I was under the impression that a 16" or 18" wheel would look pretty snazzy on there.


Goin' Round Traffic Circles @ 50Km/h!!! \m/ -- 1998 E0 SVT #2119 of 6535 \m/ -- 2003 Sentra SE-R Spec V
#1510588 03/04/06 03:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 62
B
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
B
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 62
Originally posted by bxd20:

According to an inertia calc I downloaded,





Where did you get that inertia calc?

#1510589 03/21/06 05:18 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,639
H
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
H
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,639
edgeracing lists some tires weights. t1s 215/4517 they have as 20lbs.


Hugo AIM:omegazodiac 95 gl & 99 contour svt #1750/2760 my profile pics stuff for sale
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  1314_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5