Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,506
P
PDXSVT Offline OP
Hard-core CEG\'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
P
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,506
It's posted in the Northwest branch forum, under the "Portland area member w/ scanner" thread.

Today's topic: Can an NA 2.5L pull ABOVE 200 fwhp on a Mustang dyno with the input of a good tuner?


MSDS, SHO-shop Y, custom 2.5" catback; xcal2; 63mm TB, K&N 3530; Koni struts, Aussie bar; THaines forks, Quaife, SpecII, UR fly; DMD; Nima UD pullies; Stazi brakes; f&r Pole120 mounts. Just a daily commuter car. Silver '98 SVT E0 #3159
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130
R
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
R
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130
I would doubt getting 200fwhp on a dynojet, let alone a mustang which produces lower but more realistic numbers. I have all your basic bolt ons and got 182fwhp with an xcal tune. I added a zex kit to get me over that 200fwhp mark though.


Originally posted by Who the F are You?:
does your family tree not have any branches on it?


99SVT 235hp @ 6550rpm 212tq @ 5350rpm
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,854
T
TGO Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
T
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,854
didn't demonsvt make close to or above 200fwhp before he did his 3l?


1999 Silver Frost SVT #609 of 2760 Quaife, lightened SVT Flywheel, SPEC stage II clutch, removed resonator, k&n drop in - various other goodies too.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,695
B
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
B
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,695
This mark would have been hit a lot sooner if I hadn't had an incident with a telephone pole.

I'm not sure Demon ever actually dyno'd his car...


04 Subaru WRX "Eurosport bling bling fast and furious tokyo drift" "They have diarrhea of the mouth, and constipation of thought"
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
A
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
A
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,140
with enough work, yes. But it would be cheaper to go 3L. You'd need some pretty careful engine work, and once you've got the engine open, why stick with the 2.5L block?


-Philip Maynard '95 Contour [71 STS | Track Whore] '97 Miata [71 ES | Boulevard Pimp] 2006 autocross results
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Y
Addicted CEG\'er
Offline
Addicted CEG\'er
Y
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Originally posted by WRX Barge:
This mark would have been hit a lot sooner if I hadn't had an incident with a telephone pole.

I'm not sure Demon ever actually dyno'd his car...




I'm pretty sure he dyno'd his 2.5L, at around 195/6fwhp.

Mark


2000 Black CSVT 3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975
G
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
G
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975
200hp on a Mustang dyno from a NA a 2.5? I seriously doubt it.


Edit - info added on my car:

Mustang dyno:
Max Power: 202.4 @ 6500 RPM
Max Torque: 177.0 @ 5750 RPM

My mods of note at the time of dyno:
3.0 hybrid
Ported & polished heads
SHM long tube headers
Extrude Honed Power Flow UIM
65mm throttle body, optimized
AFE 8" filter w/ heat shield
Bassani cat-back exhaust
Torsen LSD
SPEC Stage 1 clutch
SPEC flywheel

Last edited by GTO Pete; 02/05/06 04:31 PM.

Capitol CEG Classifieds Make an offer! 2005 GTO IBM - 337hp/336tq
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130
R
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
R
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,130
that's exactly what I wanted to say. With the amount of work it would take to get a 2.5L there you could just drop in a 3L.


Originally posted by Who the F are You?:
does your family tree not have any branches on it?


99SVT 235hp @ 6550rpm 212tq @ 5350rpm
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7
R
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
R
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7
Question is, did we believe it? In a word...NO. Were we surprised? Yes. Could it be a fluke? Could be. Could be ideal weather conditions, could be ??? Following this run, the first thing we checked was calibration. It was on the money. Then we put a FF AC Cobra on the Dyno, that had known Dyno numbers from another MD Dyno in Florida that the customer had purchased and transported in. He wanted to verify his numbers and Dyno sheet he received when he purchased the car, and as he put it, wanted to make sure he had been "told the truth about the power output".
425 HP and 437 ft/lbs in Florida. 420 HP and 436 ft/lbs on ours.
What does all this tell us? We are not sure except to say we knew it made 110 HP with the exhaust plugged. 33.7 psi of back pressure. We installed new plugs, wires, exhaust and raised the rev limiter and installed a tune. Those are the numbers it spit out.
One other comment. Last year we did a 69 BB Chevelle. A 90 HP gain. Did our customer believe it? NO. That was, until he hit the track. He previous best ever was a 12.80. His new ET? 11.90.

Ron

Last edited by ronster; 02/05/06 05:46 PM.
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,141
P
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
P
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,141
Originally posted by GTO Pete:
200hp on a Mustang dyno from a NA a 2.5? I seriously




Disreguarding the idea of just bolt-ons, Mumm Brothers had i believe 295 hp out of their n/a 2.5 race engine.


99 SE V6\5spd - 156 HP\157 TQ 15.166-90.84 Totaled 02/12/06 99 SVT # 1571 - 175 HP\153 TQ 14.999-91.88 Born 3/24/99 Reborn 3/18/06 Pietenpol Racing Technologies project vehicle 90 Festiva L 5spd, Blue(not for long), 103k
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  mbb41_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5