|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,854
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,854 |
i know, but i figure crazy horse racing would have a mustang dyno before anything else.
1999 Silver Frost SVT
#609 of 2760
Quaife, lightened SVT Flywheel, SPEC stage II clutch, removed resonator, k&n drop in - various other goodies too.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,580
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,580 |
I pulled 181 on a dynojet with an intake and removed resonator.
** Mike **
"You might beat me in a straight line, but I'll embarass you in the turns"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065 |
Originally posted by TodrasByAssociation:
I pulled 181 on a dynojet with an intake and removed resonator.
And SAFC 2?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 254
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 254 |
I was just looking over my dynos done on a dynojet. With a std correction factor I had 182 hp and 156 tq. With a SAE correction I get 176 hp 151 tq. My Air fuel is down at 10. If I had a decent air fuel I think I could probably make decent numbers on a mustang dyno also. I really don't have many mods. Optimized y pipe and tb, magnaflow center resonator and a K&N. I should really get my car tuned.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,445
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,445 |
i dont remember the exact numbers but my car pulled about 176HP with the resonator removed and a K&N.
and that was not a mustang dyno.
NY State Trooper: So what makes your car so special to have SVT all over it?
Me: Er...It was made by Fords SPECIAL Vehicle Team?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,600
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,600 |
Damn, I must have a dog  
#4559 of 6535 born on Feb 17, 1998
Black 1998.5 CSVT
FOR SALE [cleaning house]: SVT rear swaybar. Reasonable offer and its yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
...or just a different dyno.
I've seen dynos vary by as much as 10% because there is NO SET STANDARD used in calibrating them. Some dynos have shorter rulers then others so even comparing dynojet to dynojet is only getting in a close ball park. Unless it is the same dyno it is not going to be an very accurate comparison.
A dyno is for tuning and not bench racing. When used like it should be it is an excellent tool. This is the main reason why Mustang dynos are so popular with tuners. They give a more consistent reading and a more accurate representation of power at any given throttle position and rpm point.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,469
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,469 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
This is the main reason why Mustang dynos are so popular with tuners. They give a more consistent reading and a more accurate representation of power at any given throttle position and rpm point.
They just make you cry when you see the #'s 
+ isnt his dyno show peak tq real low in the rpm range? I thought tours peak tq was close to 6k not 2,850(before imrc opens) 
Last edited by dubkatz; 01/16/06 07:33 PM.
98 csvt t-red.. sho-shop intake, b&m, fidanza, spec1 clutch, Torsen, DMD,optimized Y& TB, Brullen, rear strut bar,h&r's,17" konig traffik's.
"I say what I mean and I do what i say"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by dubkatz:
+ isnt his dyno show peak tq real low in the rpm range? I thought tours peak tq was close to 6k not 2,850(before imrc opens)
The IMRC creates that early torque spike by the low speed, high density air from on using just the short runners. (i.e. restriction) It's also why the stock engine falls flat on it's face at 3000rpm if they don't open.
My first dyno showed 168 FWTQ below IMRC and 164 FWTQ above IMRC. (not stock of course) The only real powerband is above the IMRC so the other higher peak value was really just a pointless number.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,469
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,469 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by dubkatz:
+ isnt his dyno show peak tq real low in the rpm range? I thought tours peak tq was close to 6k not 2,850(before imrc opens)
The IMRC creates that early torque spike by the low speed, high density air from on using just the short runners. (i.e. restriction) It's also why the stock engine falls flat on it's face at 3000rpm if they don't open.
My first dyno showed 168 FWTQ below IMRC and 164 FWTQ above IMRC. (not stock of course) The only real powerband is above the IMRC so the other higher peak value was really just a pointless number.
Ahh yes i see his next tq peak is at 5,600 and its onlt 1tq lower.
98 csvt t-red.. sho-shop intake, b&m, fidanza, spec1 clutch, Torsen, DMD,optimized Y& TB, Brullen, rear strut bar,h&r's,17" konig traffik's.
"I say what I mean and I do what i say"
|
|
|
|
|
