Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 36 of 50 1 2 34 35 36 37 38 49 50
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,637
T
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
T
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,637
they all said the Welders wernt high enough quality... That they couldent weld it properly, should i take it back to them and tell them it can be done...


99 TRed Contour SVT # 1853 out of 2760 230.2 WHP @ 6500 237.0 WTR @ 2250
Originally posted by MxRacer:
Originally posted by RawBurt:
I'll be keeping it to myself, until the time comes. It'll be hard to find.


much like your weiner.


#1455254 01/31/06 10:03 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 32
G
New CEG\'er
Offline
New CEG\'er
G
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 32
I kind of browsed over this a while ago and only noticed someone saying these help when you jack the car up, which isn't a hobby of mine, so I haven't given this much attention. But now I see that this might offer huge suspension gains, especially since I autocross. I just bought a rear strut brace and rear sway bar trying to stiffen everything up.
Is there a flex problem that hurts our handling on Contours/Cougars that this helps? Can anyone feel the difference in handling from this?
If so, I'll buy anyone's that can't get theirs installed.


Thanks, Jonathan Baker http://gi8u2racing.cougardb.com
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301
C
Addicted CEG\'er
Offline
Addicted CEG\'er
C
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301
#18 arrived today

Thanks a lot Steve for getting these made. One of the best group buys I have been a part of.


-Ken V. 1998.5 SE Praire Tan Zetec ATX psycho_bass@hotmail.com Roush springs Roush rear sway bar BAT struts 17" Millie Miglia HT3 and a ton of subtle asthetic mods
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 439
O
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
O
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 439
I'm going to pick mine up at the post office right now!! I'm grinning like an idiot...


Ohsigmachi '96 GL MTX Zetec --I don't won't to hurt you, but it's still on my list of things to do.-- View projectSlippery Slope
#1455257 02/01/06 03:43 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 84
H
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
H
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 84
GI8U2racing,

This is a great question and hopefully I can answer it for you. I go to church with a gentlman who raced Formula Fords and Mustangs. He did all the suspension and steering work for his teams. He has been out of it for about 4 years now, but I think his advice still stands.

I autocross my contour as well and I was about to do the D2 Coilover group buy and I asked his advice. He told me to hold onto my grand and first go for a front strut brace then subframe connectors. He told me that's the first thing he would do to all the Mustangs they raced.

He told that for the Contour, the subframe connectors would make a big difference in high speed cornering. A few days after this, the Subframe Connector group buy came out. Isn't God cool! Anyway here's why the subframe connectors help:

The contour is a front wheel drive, 4-door car. Because of this, whenever executing turns at high speeds, the car twists about the door pillars in between the front and rear doors. For example, if you make a hard left turn, the front of the car is going to twist to the left, whereas the rear of the car will twist right. This puts most of the grip load on the left front tire and rear right tire (for a left turn) and vice-versa for a right turn. This is not good (for obvious reasons) since you want all tires as planted to the ground as much as possible to get maximum grip and minimum body roll. The connectors essentially prevent this twist since they intersect the plane at which the car twists.

He told me first get the front strut bar, then the subframes, then the coilovers. I ran out of cash after the first two and a battery-relocation project I am still working on. D2 s for next year maybe...

I hope this makes sense


1998 SVT + Goodies Hal's How To's
#1455258 02/01/06 04:22 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,600
K
Addicted CEG\'er
Offline
Addicted CEG\'er
K
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,600
I think you are a little mixed up on weight transfer, it seems backwards to me.

Also front strut bars do little to nothing on this car as the strut towers are right next to the firewall. The rear one does a lot more than the front.

I have noticed a pretty big increase in torsional rigidity after having these installed. Chassis flex seems non-existant now. Even if you think its fine before, after having these you will realize how much your car flexed before.


#4559 of 6535 born on Feb 17, 1998 Black 1998.5 CSVT FOR SALE [cleaning house]: SVT rear swaybar. Reasonable offer and its yours!
#1455259 02/01/06 04:30 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
K
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
K
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
Not saying your buddy doesn't know what he's talking about, but all cars are different. A uni-body contour is quite different from the cars he's used to.

All cars have chassis flex. And yes it's good to improve it. But a front strut tower bar is not even close to being the most effective (if at all effective) suspension part for contours. Subframe connectors would be better than the fstb. But as far as doing either over good springs and struts, I wouldn't go that far at all. Good springs and struts will make the biggest difference, then a bigger rear sway, rear strut tower bar, and so on. But don't forget, the most important thing is tires.


98.5 SVT 91 Escort GT (almost sold) 96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve) FS: SVT rear sway bar WTB: Very cheap beater CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
#1455260 02/01/06 04:36 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 439
O
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
O
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 439
Originally posted by hsoverma:
GI8U2racing,

This is a great question and hopefully I can answer it for you. I go to church with a gentlman who raced Formula Fords and Mustangs. He did all the suspension and steering work for his teams. He has been out of it for about 4 years now, but I think his advice still stands.

I autocross my contour as well and I was about to do the D2 Coilover group buy and I asked his advice. He told me to hold onto my grand and first go for a front strut brace then subframe connectors. He told me that's the first thing he would do to all the Mustangs they raced.

He told that for the Contour, the subframe connectors would make a big difference in high speed cornering. A few days after this, the Subframe Connector group buy came out. Isn't God cool! Anyway here's why the subframe connectors help:

The contour is a front wheel drive, 4-door car. Because of this, whenever executing turns at high speeds, the car twists about the door pillars in between the front and rear doors. For example, if you make a hard left turn, the front of the car is going to twist to the left, whereas the rear of the car will twist right. This puts most of the grip load on the left front tire and rear right tire (for a left turn) and vice-versa for a right turn. This is not good (for obvious reasons) since you want all tires as planted to the ground as much as possible to get maximum grip and minimum body roll. The connectors essentially prevent this twist since they intersect the plane at which the car twists.

He told me first get the front strut bar, then the subframes, then the coilovers. I ran out of cash after the first two and a battery-relocation project I am still working on. D2 s for next year maybe...

I hope this makes sense




I personally think the shocks and springs do more on this car (as far as overal grip is concerned) than the subframe connectors would...the subframe connectors are going to make your stock suspension work harder, and may actually increase your body roll since the shock and springs will be take the full brunt of the chasis' weight transfer. steering may be more accurate but your overall weight transfer in hard conering will probably overwork your stock suspension...strut tower braces will do the same, but to a lesser degree.


Ohsigmachi '96 GL MTX Zetec --I don't won't to hurt you, but it's still on my list of things to do.-- View projectSlippery Slope
#1455261 02/01/06 05:25 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,292
9
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
9
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,292
Originally posted by KingpinSVT:
I think you are a little mixed up on weight transfer, it seems backwards to me.

Also front strut bars do little to nothing on this car as the strut towers are right next to the firewall. The rear one does a lot more than the front.

I have noticed a pretty big increase in torsional rigidity after having these installed. Chassis flex seems non-existant now. Even if you think its fine before, after having these you will realize how much your car flexed before.



i'll agree with chris on this one..if you've ever had the dash out you'd see why,theres a two inch pipe running from one side of the car to the other on the firewall....i still have a fstb though,they look good


"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but STUPID lasts forever."-Aristophanes. --93 pgt,headers,intake,borla=14.9 1/4mile
#1455262 02/01/06 05:54 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,600
K
Addicted CEG\'er
Offline
Addicted CEG\'er
K
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,600
I still have one too


#4559 of 6535 born on Feb 17, 1998 Black 1998.5 CSVT FOR SALE [cleaning house]: SVT rear swaybar. Reasonable offer and its yours!
Page 36 of 50 1 2 34 35 36 37 38 49 50

Moderated by  1314_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5