|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 759
Veteran CEG\'er
|
OP
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 759 |
Okay, lets get this thread re-started without the other comments. If you don't have anything to contribute, then don't reply. I personally am working on a T3/T4 setup for my 3.0 swap, so I am interested as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 117
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 117 |
thanks, that other thread was getting stupid quick.
'96 Contour GL ATX 2.5 v6 -- Daily Driver
'93 SVT Lightning -- The Toy
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,097
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,097 |
many people have used the t3/t4. Without the specs however...it is hard to get any answer.
So mamisano...what's your Q.
98 E0 SVT with some stuff
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,746
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,746 |
Originally posted by stilov:
many people have used the t3/t4. Without the specs however...it is hard to get any answer.
So mamisano...what's your Q.
and remember the more specific you can be with everything...the better the answers will be from the members of CEG.
2000 Contour SVT
SF - #542 of 2150
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4 |
how high are you looking to rev the engine?
how much power are you chasing?
take a look at a gt35r or maybe a to4z.
Drew
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 759
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
OP
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 759 |
Originally posted by Roverdose:
how high are you looking to rev the engine?
how much power are you chasing?
take a look at a gt35r or maybe a to4z.
Drew
To rich for me at this time. The GT35R is well north of $1000. I am looking to get a T3/T4 hybrid, 60 Trim, and .63 on the exhaust side. Want to spool quick (hence the .63) and make ~300whp on a 3.0.
What is a T04z?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
I'd go with the .86 A/R housing. It spools up more then quick enough on the 3L and makes a better powerband for our chassis.
Tom's been running one for years now.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860 |
2001 Lincoln LS8
1994 Lexus GS300
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 759
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
OP
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 759 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
I'd go with the .86 A/R housing. It spools up more then quick enough on the 3L and makes a better powerband for our chassis.
Tom's been running one for years now.
Yeah, I have been in contact with Tom for the past few weeks. He mentioned that the .63 would be a better choice for quicker spool up, highway milage, etc. If I wanted to go higher power, then he advised to go with the .82.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 110
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 110 |
Definately go w/ the .82 A/R for the 3L. The quicker spool is useless in this application. Tom's been spinning the wheels like crazy even w/ the .82 A/R.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
