Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
#1053839 09/17/04 08:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,746
J
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
J
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,746
Excluding SVT's, I think pre-98's look better.


"...first he's gonna s*!t, then he's gonna kill us." 1999 Contour SVT Retrojunk.com
#1053840 09/17/04 08:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
B
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
The really only main aesthetic difference between the 95s and 96-97 is the chrome inserts in the front and rear fascias. But even then, I dont think any chrome belongs on a contour, so imo the chrome really detracts from the car. I wouldnt go as far as to say that the car is ugly though.

btw, heres some slight whoring of my 96.


Jim Hahn 1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04 3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit 364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
#1053841 09/17/04 08:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
T
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
T
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
I like both the pre-98 and the 98+, especially with an SE trim package. The pre-98 hood line gives a subtle hint of something under there, the lip spoiler completes that subtle influence... The 98+, well I'm bias. I think they're dead sekzy. I just wish I could add a lip spoiler to my trunk - reflector & all.


Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
#1053842 09/17/04 08:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,325
S
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
S
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,325
I'm not a big fan of the faux chrome, but I like it better than the ugly @ss refelctor on the 98+ trunks!

IMHO - the absolute best year is a 97



97 Contour SE MTX K&N 3530, UR UDP, 19# Injectors, mystery mod, FMS wires, Fordchip.com chip, SVT: TB, Flywheel, clutch, exhaust 04 Grand Caravan SXT
#1053843 09/17/04 09:08 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
So you abhor ODB-II because with it you couldn't pass inspection.

There's great logic...


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1053844 09/17/04 09:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
I like the 95-97 SE's or especially with the SVT kit.

MUST HAVE NEW HEADLIGHTS! They yellow and haze so damn fast and it kills the appearance.
Grill mods are a big bonus.
No chrome strip!

They did have better quality interiors. Though mine has held up well so I'm not complaining. (Dash aside )

Nothing compares to the early rear trunk lid. With or without lip spoiler. (I prefer with)
So much better then the fugly reflector on the 98+ models.

One of these days I will actually swap mine out. (been on my list for a while ) However I never really have to look at it only the people that race me do...


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1053845 09/17/04 09:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816
B
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
B
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
The really only main aesthetic difference between the 95s and 96-97 is the chrome inserts in the front and rear fascias. But even then, I dont think any chrome belongs on a contour, so imo the chrome really detracts from the car. I wouldnt go as far as to say that the car is ugly though.

btw, heres some slight whoring of my 96.





Is that bumper cover for a Mk 1 Mondeo? I notice the flat part for the grill on it... like it goes to a Mondeo. AFAIK, The Mk 1 Mondeo's had paralell lines on the bumper and hood for the grill, then the ends were circular, unlike the oval shape of our grills.


Goin' Round Traffic Circles @ 50Km/h!!! \m/ -- 1998 E0 SVT #2119 of 6535 \m/ -- 2003 Sentra SE-R Spec V
#1053846 09/17/04 10:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Y
Addicted CEG\'er
Offline
Addicted CEG\'er
Y
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Kane,

That is actually an SVT front bumper with Mirko Splitter. Jim molded that himself to fit his pre-98. He was the first to do this mod, and since then, Mikah has produced one similar to Jim's. His car looks great in person also.

Mark



2000 Black CSVT 3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
#1053847 09/17/04 10:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,446
G
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
G
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,446
I certainly beg to differ your opinion!!




But ok when my car looked like this, then yes it was ugly.But thats time well spent in order to have the only fibeglas hood and one of the Micah bumpers.


Formaly FLCEGkid Chris Bertrand 1995 Ford Contour Gl 2.5 V6 MTX FOR SALE! Somebody please buy my Fiberglas hood!!
#1053848 09/17/04 11:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301
C
Addicted CEG\'er
Offline
Addicted CEG\'er
C
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301
Originally posted by SVTcontourSVT:
with an SVT bodykit a 95 can look damn nice to.




-Ken V. 1998.5 SE Praire Tan Zetec ATX psycho_bass@hotmail.com Roush springs Roush rear sway bar BAT struts 17" Millie Miglia HT3 and a ton of subtle asthetic mods
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  GTO Pete, Trapps_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5