|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,746
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,746 |
Excluding SVT's, I think pre-98's look better.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
The really only main aesthetic difference between the 95s and 96-97 is the chrome inserts in the front and rear fascias. But even then, I dont think any chrome belongs on a contour, so imo the chrome really detracts from the car. I wouldnt go as far as to say that the car is ugly though. btw, heres some slight whoring of my 96.
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117 |
I like both the pre-98 and the 98+, especially with an SE trim package. The pre-98 hood line gives a subtle hint of something under there, the lip spoiler completes that subtle influence... The 98+, well I'm bias. I think they're dead sekzy. I just wish I could add a lip spoiler to my trunk - reflector & all.
Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,325
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,325 |
I'm not a big fan of the faux chrome, but I like it better than the ugly @ss refelctor on the 98+ trunks! IMHO - the absolute best year is a 97
97 Contour SE MTX
K&N 3530, UR UDP, 19# Injectors, mystery mod, FMS wires, Fordchip.com chip, SVT: TB, Flywheel, clutch, exhaust
04 Grand Caravan SXT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
So you abhor ODB-II because with it you couldn't pass inspection. There's great logic...
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
I like the 95-97 SE's or especially with the SVT kit.
MUST HAVE NEW HEADLIGHTS! They yellow and haze so damn fast and it kills the appearance.
Grill mods are a big bonus.
No chrome strip!
They did have better quality interiors. Though mine has held up well so I'm not complaining. (Dash aside )
Nothing compares to the early rear trunk lid. With or without lip spoiler. (I prefer with)
So much better then the fugly reflector on the 98+ models.
One of these days I will actually swap mine out. (been on my list for a while ) However I never really have to look at it only the people that race me do...
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,816 |
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE: The really only main aesthetic difference between the 95s and 96-97 is the chrome inserts in the front and rear fascias. But even then, I dont think any chrome belongs on a contour, so imo the chrome really detracts from the car. I wouldnt go as far as to say that the car is ugly though.
btw, heres some slight whoring of my 96.
Is that bumper cover for a Mk 1 Mondeo? I notice the flat part for the grill on it... like it goes to a Mondeo. AFAIK, The Mk 1 Mondeo's had paralell lines on the bumper and hood for the grill, then the ends were circular, unlike the oval shape of our grills.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
Kane,
That is actually an SVT front bumper with Mirko Splitter. Jim molded that himself to fit his pre-98. He was the first to do this mod, and since then, Mikah has produced one similar to Jim's. His car looks great in person also.
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,446
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,446 |
I certainly beg to differ your opinion!! But ok when my car looked like this, then yes it was ugly.But thats time well spent in order to have the only fibeglas hood and one of the Micah bumpers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301
Addicted CEG\'er
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301 |
Originally posted by SVTcontourSVT: with an SVT bodykit a 95 can look damn nice to.
-Ken V.
1998.5 SE Praire Tan Zetec ATX
psycho_bass@hotmail.com
Roush springs Roush rear sway bar BAT struts 17" Millie Miglia HT3 and a ton of subtle asthetic mods
|
|
|
|
|