Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#1043162 11/24/04 04:39 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,639
H
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
H
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,639
Quote:

Don't try to make this adjustment with alignment equipment. It is very unlikely that you will end up with adjustments anywhere near correct.



how come? shouldnt the settings be made when get an alignment?


Hugo AIM:omegazodiac 95 gl & 99 contour svt #1750/2760 my profile pics stuff for sale
#1043163 11/24/04 05:24 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Originally posted by TomV:
I don't understand how this will increase the wear rate of axles and bearing? The 1998 Ford CDROM Workshop Manual actually states the following for the Contour front suspension specifications:

Maximum variation - left to right-hand side - Castor 1.00�° (1�°00') Camber 1.25�° (1�°15')





The subframe being out of alignment???

I was responding to "your" post not the caster/camber question.

To add: if you don't align the powertrain the effects are even worse. (i.e. OEM powertrain alignment tool)


Caster & camber within specs should not adversely affect either.
Significant caster or camber can though because it harshly changes the angle of the shaft's outer tripod housing and also increases the downward force applied on the inner edge of the bearings.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1043164 11/24/04 02:05 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 46
T
New CEG\'er
Offline
New CEG\'er
T
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 46
Thanks for the clarification, now I see your point. Looks like I've got some more scheduling to do. It feels like this problem is never going to go away.


2000 CSVT (#289 of 2150) 1989 Mustang GT
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Andy W._dup1, Auto-X Fil 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5