What's your preference? - 12/11/05 03:18 AM
My contique is a pre 98. I've compared it to post 98's and I must say i think the interior holds up better in pre-98's than post-98's. I just think its better build quality. Any thoughts?
Originally posted by 98 SE:
If you're talking dash warp, then definitely. Brapple noted something about the doors sounding more solid as well.
For aesthetic preference, I like the cloth available on 98+'s better than the cloth pattern on pre98s. However, the '95 leather front buckets own all others in terms of comfort. I sat in his dad's car at a meet and didn't want to get out!
Originally posted by Tourige:
How do you people have so many Miles on your cars? i have 125k KM'S, and i feel like that is a lot...
Originally posted by Goonz SVT:
i sat in brapples seats and my god it was a total different feel and comfort..the svt leather is stiff and not really designed for comfortness..
Originally posted by Slack Master Doug:
That sucks... mine are quite comfortable.
Originally posted by OoTLink:
The 95-97 interior rawks! The door handles/locks are really cool (even with the funky motor, it sounds cool), which sure they exist in the 98+, but it aint the same...
The window controls and such are on the door panel and not on the funky thing next to the handle on the 98+, that's yucky.
Originally posted by Matt R:
I would definatly say when I swapped from cloth to leather, the cloth was more comfortable, but only because of the range of motion of the seats... if the leather seats could go farther than they did, they would be more comfortable.
Originally posted by BadDoctorFrost:
That's not a very glorifying picture of the pre98 Mystique; look at the poor broken dash vents I'm assuming that's a 1995 from before they upgraded the center vents.
Originally posted by TourDeForce:
I want a '98 Mystique dash for my car...
Originally posted by TourDeForce:
I want a '98 Mystique dash for my car...
Originally posted by Jeb Hoge:
Originally posted by TourDeForce:
I want a '98 Mystique dash for my car...
I wish my light switches were set like that, in the armrest. I like that better than the oddly contorting door panel switches on the Tour.
Originally posted by TwoTwinTours:
Originally posted by Matt R:
I would definatly say when I swapped from cloth to leather, the cloth was more comfortable, but only because of the range of motion of the seats... if the leather seats could go farther than they did, they would be more comfortable.
Are you talking about how far back the entire seat moves? I noticed that when I swapped from cloth to leather in my Mystique. I moved the seat all the way back and I kept hitting my knees off the steering wheel,when before with the cloth I never hit my knees off the wheel. I found I had to have the cushion of the seat tilted as far back as it would go and recline the seat quite far back to give me the illusion of feeling sitting farther away. After a while I got used to it though,but even my passengers complained the seat didn't move back far enough and some taller people were hitting their knees off the glovebox.
As for the interior,I quite like the Contique interiors,no matter what year,but my preference goes to the pre98s for build quality,seat comfort,the console and the light package.
Originally posted by 98 SE:I like post98 interiors better.
For aesthetic preference, I like the cloth available on 98+'s better than the cloth pattern on pre98s. However, the '95 leather front buckets own all others in terms of comfort. I sat in his dad's car at a meet and didn't want to get out!
Originally posted by zetec herman:
I've always wondered what cupholders is everyone talking about for pre-98's? Mine doesn't have cupholders. Mabye it was somehow taken out. Possibly it wasn't available on GL's?
Originally posted by zetec herman:
I've always wondered what cupholders is everyone talking about for pre-98's? Mine doesn't have cupholders. Mabye it was somehow taken out. Possibly it wasn't available on GL's?
Originally posted by MadMerc97:
I like my interior, but I have some nags...
1. The "can" holders suck. Cool lookin', but useless.
2. The seatback adjustment wheel sucks on Pre-98s.
3. The slats on my AC vents are screwed up from people hitting them
4. NO LUMBAR SUPPORT.
5. The car is obviously not meant for us '6"2 people. I've got the seat all the way back, and I just barely fit.
Other than that, I love my interior. It's decently classy, when kept in good shape...
Originally posted by BrApple:
Originally posted by MadMerc97:
I like my interior, but I have some nags...
1. The "can" holders suck. Cool lookin', but useless.
2. The seatback adjustment wheel sucks on Pre-98s.
3. The slats on my AC vents are screwed up from people hitting them
4. NO LUMBAR SUPPORT.
5. The car is obviously not meant for us '6"2 people. I've got the seat all the way back, and I just barely fit.
Other than that, I love my interior. It's decently classy, when kept in good shape...
1. sure
2. ok
3. don't let people hit em
4. 95 SE leather seats have had adjustable lumbar support, my LS has power lumbar suport and seat back
5. I'm 6 ft and I don't sit anyway close to having the seat all the way back
Originally posted by MadMerc97:
Originally posted by BrApple:
Originally posted by MadMerc97:
I like my interior, but I have some nags...
1. The "can" holders suck. Cool lookin', but useless.
2. The seatback adjustment wheel sucks on Pre-98s.
3. The slats on my AC vents are screwed up from people hitting them
4. NO LUMBAR SUPPORT.
5. The car is obviously not meant for us '6"2 people. I've got the seat all the way back, and I just barely fit.
Other than that, I love my interior. It's decently classy, when kept in good shape...
1. sure
2. ok
3. don't let people hit em
4. 95 SE leather seats have had adjustable lumbar support, my LS has power lumbar suport and seat back
5. I'm 6 ft and I don't sit anyway close to having the seat all the way back
Unfortunately, I have a '97 with cloth upholstery, which means 0 lumbar. Well my seat is ALL the way back. Maybe I'm just used to driving Firebirds and Crown Victorias...