|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,303
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,303 |
Originally posted by spazz:
The 2000 ATX Duratech ran 0-60 in 9.7 seconds and the 1/4 in 18.4 seconds. These are offically "un"= offical times.
The SVT ran 0-60 in 6.7 and 1/4 in 15.3.
Kinda dug this up from several months ago...musta been looking hard.
Originally posted by Mkingracing:
Sorry the 1998 svt ran 7.8 secs 0-60 and 15.8's 1/4
1999-2000 svt ran 7.6 secs 0-60 and 15.4-15.6 1/4
Many people claimed differnt 1/4 miles between the 99-00
Really?
Car and Driver gave the 99 CSVT a 15.2 in the 1/4 mile. And I don't think the 98's were too far off that either.
Goonz12: <---tries on mommy's cloths
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,045
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,045 |
Originally posted by Mkingracing:
Originally posted by spazz:
The SVT ran 0-60 in 6.7 and 1/4 in 15.3.
Sorry the 1998 svt ran 7.8 secs 0-60 and 15.8's 1/4
1999-2000 svt ran 7.6 secs 0-60 and 15.4-15.6 1/4
that depends on who you are talking to. my ford documentation says the slower time but motor trend said the other.
00 black/tan svt, #2052 of 2150, born 2/1/00
formerly known as my csvt
"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than a sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,303
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,303 |
from what I hear, ford usually gives pretty conservative stats.
Goonz12: <---tries on mommy's cloths
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,356
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,356 |
Forgot to say that my car is also a Late-99 and has the returnless fuel system. 
1999 Mystique LS V6
Alpine CDA-9807, Rear deck sub, Opt. TB, K&N RU-3530/MAF adaptor, custom heatshield, FSVT 17's, SCT 4-program chip, Eibach's/ST200's, Hella Fogs...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651 |
Originally posted by DopePope:
Originally posted by spazz:
The 2000 ATX Duratech ran 0-60 in 9.7 seconds and the 1/4 in 18.4 seconds. These are offically "un"= offical times.
The SVT ran 0-60 in 6.7 and 1/4 in 15.3.
Kinda dug this up from several months ago...musta been looking hard.
Originally posted by Mkingracing:
Sorry the 1998 svt ran 7.8 secs 0-60 and 15.8's 1/4
1999-2000 svt ran 7.6 secs 0-60 and 15.4-15.6 1/4
Many people claimed differnt 1/4 miles between the 99-00
Really?
Car and Driver gave the 99 CSVT a 15.2 in the 1/4 mile. And I don't think the 98's were too far off that either.
Well these are times from the 98 and 99 brochures that i got from Ford when i was originally going to buy an svt back then. And i have the svt calender that offers the information!!
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
IIRC my SVT manual states 15.7 and I have a 2000 SVT.
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,292
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,292 |
well the ford people must have been on pcp at the time, i've seen old motortrends that have the 96se at 7.9 0-60...svt's are deff lower 7's maybe even seven flat for the strong runners........who in the hell would believe a company that lied about the size of the engine in its most famous car for a decade or more, or lie about its hp rating more than once.....look in your svt manual and check out the speed it says you can do in each gear...do they look right to you??? i can do most of those in my 96, well except for the 145mph
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but STUPID lasts forever."-Aristophanes.
--93 pgt,headers,intake,borla=14.9 1/4mile
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
"Magazine bench racing"
SVT = 7.1-7.4 & 15.2-15.4 @ 90-91
Non SVT V6 MTX = 7.5-7.7 & 15.8-15.9 @ 88
Nothing else matters...  
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 183
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 183 |
Something else is that the top speeds are different. It says 143 but I kno i have gone faster then that, (Usually when i go that fast, im not looking down at the gauges) but i think i had shut off at 147 or somewhere around in there.
The "Bluer Tour" 1998.5 SVTour
R.I.P. 2000 ATX Tour SE
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
I have no life
|
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653 |
Speedo isn't very accurate at high speeds, and if you were going downhill or had a tail wind, then yeah that could factor in.
98.5 SVT
91 Escort GT (almost sold)
96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve)
FS: SVT rear sway bar
WTB: Very cheap beater
CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
|
|
|
|
|
