Quote:

sigma proved my point that the WMDs we find over there have to be of some special kind to count as actual WMDs. So I could spend my time and go and find news stories (I never saved them on my desktop, sorry ) of evidence of WMD in Iraq, but I'm sure a grand story (like sigma's) about why they don't count as WMDs would follow.



If "special" means "actual sanction-violating weapons" then, yes, you need to find some "special" ones.

2 shells. A whopping 2 shells, that our own military and the Bush Administration have discounted as being any sort of proof of a WMD program, are proof enough for you, then I'm happy that you're opinion doesn't count for anything.

By your wonderful reasoning if I walked over there, placed a WMD in the sand, and pointed it out to a US soldier, it's all the proof we needed that Iraq continued to develop WMDs after imposed sanctions.

Please, tell me how a shell produced before the Persian Gulf War is proof that Iraq continued to develop WMDs after the War. I'm really interested in how you reach that conclusion.

Before you go off spouting loads of crap, I suggest you read the entire news stories. And, please, as others have asked, post links to these stories you say exist showing that we've found "many" WMDs. I'd love for you to make me eat crow on this.

2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX Webpage 2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX