Originally posted by The Striped SVT:
I don't think any of who were there, myself included, were "jerking off" to anything  all I know is this, I pulled a better hp # on the Mustang Dyno than I did on the dyno that measures it higher, thats all I'm sayin' and since the guy was giving us the "corrected" numbers, we ran with it. There IS going to be a trip to a local dyno with a a DynoJet and then we'll see. Its nice to see the support out there by our CEG-ers, raining on the parade as usual 
Well we just speak the truth and if it hurts, so be it. The point Demon and I are making is that you can't be adding dyno correction factors and then claiming your car puts down said HP/TQ. Your car probably is making more power, but claiming your car is a ~190whp car when all it did was low 170s just doesn't make sense. If you do go to a Dynojet, make sure and use the same one you did the first time. Different Dynojets don't read the same. The decrepiency can be as high as 5-7%.
Dave
black 96 Maxima SE
Best ET/MPH: 14.31@99.3mph with a 2.18 60'
JDM intake manifold, ECU, intake, y-pipe, muffler
| 
