Originally posted by The Striped SVT:
Quote:

That's real accurate...

It's 171 on a Mustang dyno. That's it



I'm a little surprised to see this post Demon, not what I expected from you at all. Most of us, including myself, have spent time on a DynoJet and its true the Mustang Dyno does infact dyno a bit lower due to how its set up, so thats why we ALL got the correction, 278 hp for Stazi, 254 for Scott Biggers turbo'd CSVT, 200 for a straight 3.0L hybrid and my 188 hp corrected. I don't think any of us are "pumping up our hp #'s", were just realizing our gains had we been on the dyno we're used to, thats all.


I think you misread my post or definitely it's intent.

It is a well known fact the Mustang dyno generates lower numbers.


My comment was about the operator saying to add "about" 10-15%

The other comment was just another re-stating that numbers between the two dyno types are not directly comparable.

No "close fudge" factor is going to generate accurate numbers directly comparable to a Dynojet.

Hence the entire statement that 171FWHP on a Mustang dyno is 171FWHP on a Mustang dyno.

188FWHP on a Dynojet is 188FWHP on a Dynojet.

2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.