|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
Originally posted by Derk2000:
171 aint half bad at all. What correction factor bumped you up to 188? 
The guys at the dyno said its about a 10-15% correction factor to what a dynojet would read, so they were just adding 10% to everyones numbers.
That's real accurate... 
It's 171 on a Mustang dyno. That's it.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
