|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 95
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 95 |
Im still in the design stage, I need your opinion Wich one do you prefer? "A" or "B"  Txs.
_________________________________________________
Contour 98.5 GL V6 Manual, 115,000 KM
(actual modifications) magnaflow exhaust
K&N induction kit, sport chip, resonator removed.
iridium plugs, heat deflector,nology wires, no pre-cats.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 974
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 974 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301 |
Originally posted by JonGordo8:
A looks better
-Ken V.
1998.5 SE Praire Tan Zetec ATX
psycho_bass@hotmail.com
Roush springs Roush rear sway bar BAT struts 17" Millie Miglia HT3 and a ton of subtle asthetic mods
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143 |
I agree(A) but if you were adding just a lip to the stock bumper...I like B
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 95
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 95 |
That is true, the option B is a lip, more simple and cheap, but the A option looks really good. Ill try to make both 
_________________________________________________
Contour 98.5 GL V6 Manual, 115,000 KM
(actual modifications) magnaflow exhaust
K&N induction kit, sport chip, resonator removed.
iridium plugs, heat deflector,nology wires, no pre-cats.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 190
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 190 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065 |
B rocks for the SE's because that looks like a molded splitter. I'd really like to see what is possible with B.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,141
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,141 |
don't know if anyone else has this problem, but all i see is "image gosted by angelfire"
if you could put a link to the pics i'ld appreciate it
99 SE V6\5spd - 156 HP\157 TQ 15.166-90.84
Totaled 02/12/06
99 SVT # 1571 - 175 HP\153 TQ 14.999-91.88
Born 3/24/99 Reborn 3/18/06
Pietenpol Racing Technologies project vehicle
90 Festiva L 5spd, Blue(not for long), 103k
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
Originally posted by pole120:
don't know if anyone else has this problem, but all i see is "image gosted by angelfire"
if you could put a link to the pics i'ld appreciate it
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,709
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,709 |
Originally posted by ZetecNinja:
I agree(A) but if you were adding just a lip to the stock bumper...I like B
Originally posted by Chickens:
Religion can't do much for ashholes (unless you are an alterboy)
98.5 Se w/SVT mods
98 E0 SVT~ sold
|
|
|
|
|
