Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 9 of 12 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 12
#96374 06/07/01 03:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 597
M
mmars Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
M
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 597
Nope. I'm using 80mm MAF w/ optimizer from Pro-Flow.

--Matt


Quote:
Originally posted by 99SVTguy:
Are you using the stock diameter MAF with your new TB? Any error codes yet? I'm way interested in this mod. Seems like a larger TB/injectors/MAF combo works great for the stang guys. I know our motors have a very high specific output, but I think there's more in it. Thanks a ton for taking pics and putting together some instructions.


Oh and here's my $0.02:

I just think its funny how skeptical people are on this website, especially when it comes to new mods. I mean, if folks would just be patient while this guy finishes up testing and tweaking his mod and tests it, then maybe some of this arguing could be avoided. Seems like if we put all of our knowledge together rather than arguing about air velocity, inner diameters, and Roush's modification strategy, we can come up with a solid modification to help keep our cars faster than the pack....in case you haven't forgotten about the new breed of imports soon to hit our shores from honda/acura and nissan.

Keep us posted man...I'm all ears...and thanks!


00' SVT Contour, Black and Blue #954 of 2150
Stock....

2003 Red Fire Convertable Cobra due in September...
#96375 06/07/01 04:05 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,794
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,794
First: Steve, if ya ever make me read something that long ever again........LOL
Second: Bret as far as flow dynamics is concerned 3mm is huge. There is alot of air that can flow through a 3mm increase in tube size. As far as why is the TB the size it is? Well lets see, something about epa rings a bell....
Third: someone out there is working on a dual throttle body setup (not sure who wink ) and we will see how that works....xchang you know who is doing it?


Just call me Judge.
People suck.
Life begins at 170mph...until that point it is just boring.....
#96376 06/07/01 06:09 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
Quote:
Originally posted by Judge:
First: Steve, if ya ever make me read something that long ever again........LOL
Second: Bret as far as flow dynamics is concerned 3mm is huge. There is alot of air that can flow through a 3mm increase in tube size. As far as why is the TB the size it is? Well lets see, something about epa rings a bell....
Third: someone out there is working on a dual throttle body setup (not sure who wink ) and we will see how that works....xchang you know who is doing it?


judge- well considering the proposed tb for a n/a engine is an increase of 10mm, i wasn't considering another 3mm for the same engine with forced induction a great jump.

something else to think about... shoshop tested tb's for the 3.0L and decided 63mm was the right size for them, you don't think they tried to use a larger tb then 63mm? not saying shoshop is the greatest tuner out there, but i am sure they dyno tested a vareity of tb sizes before choosing 63mm. they don't have to worry about emissions or anything like that... so why is theirs so (relatively) small?


i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

08/15/2001 - 11/05/2001 : 1999 Ford Contour SVT : 170fwhp - 147.9 fwtq
07/17/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Roush Mustang GT Stage 1
11/05/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
#96377 06/07/01 06:19 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,248
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,248
"something else to think about... shoshop tested tb's for the 3.0L and decided 63mm was the right size for them, you don't think they tried to use a larger tb then 63mm?"

Actually this is a bit odd...
63mm has 31.1 cm2 of flow area or only about 10% more than the 28.3 cm2 flow area of the SVT 60mm
So why only increase TB size 10% with an increase in displacement of 20% (not to mention increased CR, headers, porting/polishing etc)?
Bret, are you SURE they checked larger T.bodies on the dyno. Id guess that if they had, a bigger T.body may work better. But this is just a guess.


1999 Amazon Green SVT Contour (#554/2760)
Stock SVT Duratec V6 with:
Intake- K&N filter/75mm MAF meter
Exhaust- MSDS Y-pipe/Bassani catback
Durability-Ford "dual mode" damper, Mobil 1/K&N oil filter
179.2 FWHP at 6900 RPM
#96378 06/07/01 06:38 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 265
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 265
Re: 63mm TB

Is this even an available size from Ford or elsewhere? Seems to me that maybe Sho Shop simply bored out a 60 and made a new plate for it. In terms of wanting to offer something for sale that would sure be a lot easier than having to fab up a new cable or do more involved mods to make another tb work. Chances are they didn't know the 65 could apparently be made to work so easily.

Just my $0.02...

dan

#96379 06/09/01 08:32 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
well.. what happend i thought today was 'd' day? i thought you had a dyno appointment? let's see those scanned results...


i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

08/15/2001 - 11/05/2001 : 1999 Ford Contour SVT : 170fwhp - 147.9 fwtq
07/17/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Roush Mustang GT Stage 1
11/05/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
#96380 06/09/01 08:34 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan Nixon:
"something else to think about... shoshop tested tb's for the 3.0L and decided 63mm was the right size for them, you don't think they tried to use a larger tb then 63mm?"

Actually this is a bit odd...
63mm has 31.1 cm2 of flow area or only about 10% more than the 28.3 cm2 flow area of the SVT 60mm
So why only increase TB size 10% with an increase in displacement of 20% (not to mention increased CR, headers, porting/polishing etc)?
Bret, are you SURE they checked larger T.bodies on the dyno. Id guess that if they had, a bigger T.body may work better. But this is just a guess.


by that logic the proper tb size for a 10.0:1 5.0L would be like 100mm...


i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

08/15/2001 - 11/05/2001 : 1999 Ford Contour SVT : 170fwhp - 147.9 fwtq
07/17/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Roush Mustang GT Stage 1
11/05/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
#96381 06/09/01 10:39 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 597
M
mmars Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
M
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 597
Well..I had to postpone the dyno runs. I had to take the SVT back to the dealer because the alternator was over charging. It fried the wiring and the battery. I should be able to get it done next week.

Sorry for the delays.

--Matt


00' SVT Contour, Black and Blue #954 of 2150
Stock....

2003 Red Fire Convertable Cobra due in September...
#96382 06/09/01 10:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 212
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 212
just to put some things in here if you bore the 54mm you can only go to 57mm difference of 3mm sho shops throttle body is also 3mm larger. when you bore a mustang tb from 65 you get 68

coincidence? no

If a naturally asppirated honda gets a PROVEN dyno gain from a 68mm on a 1.8L engine

How can you concieve theres a lose why do these companys only go this much larger COST. I believe there will be nice numbers.


98 silver frost SVT
custom built intake, offroad y-pipe,mystery mod,remote optimizer,short shifter,zex nitrous, lots of stereo, 17 konigs

with paradas.(bent) TOTALED do to freak electrical fire?(that started at a wireing harness ford neglected to tell me should have been recalled as they did with the 95se) I miss this car.

NEW PROFFESSION AS A TROLL.

new car. 2000 dodge dakota 4.7l v8. custombuilt intake, custom exhaust, kennebell pcm, and electric fan conversion, 180 stat, 3.55 pegleg, my old stereo system, 17x7 billets and 255-50 nitto 450 tires. next drop and traction adders. g-tech 14.5

in search of 95 se fivespeed to hang contourparts on.
#96383 06/11/01 06:33 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,237
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,237
I just thought I would chime in here to let people know that you DO NOT NEED TO MODIFY YOUR CONTOUR'S THROTTLE CABLE. If you clock the throttle shaft through 180°, the stock Contour throttle cable AND cruise control cable all hook up to the Mustang TB's connectors in the same way as the Contour TB. Trust me I have done it. And if you check my write up in the 65mm TB install in this Performance section, you will see clear pics showing everything you need to do to make the 65mm TB work perfectly on the cContour, which I can guarantee carries over to installing the 70mm TB.


Regards,
Anastazi
Father of the Aussie Bar
anastazi.sarigiannis@aam.com

"Computer games don't affect kids. I mean if Pacman affected us as kids, we'd all run around in a darkened room, munching pills and listening to repetitive music."
-----------------------------------

2000 Silver Frost SVT #1126 of 2150
8" AFE/"Big-Mouth" Intake, Modified BAT Pipe, IAT Mod - A'PEXi S-AFC, Superchip, No Secondaries, Cobra/CSVT Hybrid MAF, Magnaflow True Duals, MYSTERY Mod, Autolite AWSF22FS's and FMS Wires, ES MM Inserts, Cross Drilled/Slotted Rotors w/ Greenstuffs, APR DTM Spoiler, Escort Cossie Vents, NACA Duct, Mirko Splitter, Koni's & H&R Springs, 24mm "Aussie" Sway Bar, 18" Enkei RS-5, 225/40R18 KDW-2's.
Pioneer DEH-P7000R, TS-6975's, TS-6855's, MTX BE104, MTX Blue Thunder PRO502
http://www.geocities.com/qikslvrsvt
Page 9 of 12 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 12

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5