Quote:
Originally posted by Judge:
First: Steve, if ya ever make me read something that long ever again........LOL
Second: Bret as far as flow dynamics is concerned 3mm is huge. There is alot of air that can flow through a 3mm increase in tube size. As far as why is the TB the size it is? Well lets see, something about epa rings a bell....
Third: someone out there is working on a dual throttle body setup (not sure who wink ) and we will see how that works....xchang you know who is doing it?


judge- well considering the proposed tb for a n/a engine is an increase of 10mm, i wasn't considering another 3mm for the same engine with forced induction a great jump.

something else to think about... shoshop tested tb's for the 3.0L and decided 63mm was the right size for them, you don't think they tried to use a larger tb then 63mm? not saying shoshop is the greatest tuner out there, but i am sure they dyno tested a vareity of tb sizes before choosing 63mm. they don't have to worry about emissions or anything like that... so why is theirs so (relatively) small?


i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

08/15/2001 - 11/05/2001 : 1999 Ford Contour SVT : 170fwhp - 147.9 fwtq
07/17/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Roush Mustang GT Stage 1
11/05/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning