|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 248
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 248 |
Ok, Bret... here is my speculation... tear on me if you want to... I am only here to offer advice. Putting the supercharger on Brads car gave him more horsepower. Providing his transmission gear ratio was the same, for him to go faster that means his car had to run higher engine speed. If this car did not have a modified oil system, such as running a windage tray, those prolonged higher RPM's most likely caused the crank to cavitate the oil pan. This starvation of oil combined with prolonged high RPM's is probably what caused the spun bearings. No, I did not personally work with him to tear the engine apart and no I am not a master of all that is in the automobile world. I am offering my best guess, and until I see Brad's engine firsthand that is all that it is.... an educated GUESS. As for running NOS and S/C's on a car, remember that you are doing something to make the engine run faster, which means bigger explosions, forcing pistons harder and causing rods and bearings to be stressed harder as well as doing things such as cavitating the oil pan in prolonged extreme RPM cases. The engines we buy from the factories now are designed to only run about 70% of their potential HP, but when you modify you increase and can sometimes exceed that percentage. I do not believe IMHO that you can just stick something on a car to make it work harder and expect the same life out of it that you would get while driving it stock without giving the engine internals that are capable of withstanding the increased HP. You do not see NASCAR racers taking a crate engine out of the box and sticking it in their car and then running it 8k RPM. They take a bare block and beef up everything because they know that stock parts will not stand prolonged exposure to wear and tear. Even after a race is over, they examine and rebuild everything to make sure that the engine is fully reliable for the next race. The simple fact that it still starts, runs and drives does not cut it for them. Ever see a NASCAR driver running the car from his last race on the track with beat up fenders and a duct taped radiator hose? I think not. Just a few words to keep in mind. Whew, I am winded from typing all of this! 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,708
Moderator
|
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,708 |
... I hate this sh*t... -Mark
You can do something for Love... You can do something for Money... But there is nothing quite so satisfying as doing something out of Spite. GTExtreme1@aol.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 248
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 248 |
Mark, If you disagree with something I said or someone else has said, I'm sorry.... I am not getting what exactly you hate. It is not my intention to make enemies here or to sour someone's day.... and if I have for you, I apologize.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 703
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 703 |
Originally posted by bret: Judge- good point. 1) Brad noon had a supercharger 2) His motor failed 3) All cars with superchargers will have motor failure.
sounds like a piss poor argument to me, go get more facts, and more cases to backup your claims, and then maybe i will start to believe that the s/c was the cause of brad's motor failure. not saying it is not possible, just asking people to stop spreading all this crap about the s/c blowing up engines. Wouldnt it be more intelligent to say that his sustained 120+mph is what really killed it? at least thats what I think he posted before. (Someone said earlier, its more how you drive it....)
Seeya FUseface "Superhero Extrordinaire" "I am Nigh-Invulnerable!" 97 LX Sport
AIM:MiguelAD8
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,708
Moderator
|
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,708 |
What I hate is all of the speculation and unwarranted comments about Brad's car and the SC in general. Let me put something in perspective. No matter what product you buy to increase performance you risk the chance of doing damage, anytime you increase your HP you also increase the strain on your engine resulting in more wear. For all intensive purposes a Cat-back exhaust can kill your car, so can a KKM...
fenderman49- I am not directing anything towards you, but rather this whole thread in general. -Mark
You can do something for Love... You can do something for Money... But there is nothing quite so satisfying as doing something out of Spite. GTExtreme1@aol.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 628
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 628 |
Hey Bret, what the hell you think we're all on here for jackass??? To offer opinions, suggestions, assistance, and to hopefully learn something about our cars. That means throwing ideas and theories around. Don't like it, GO AWAY!!!! JACKASS!!!
'01 Cobra Laser Red
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,562
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,562 |
Two points... 1. I never got a UDP. It was in the plans, but after the SC came out and I found out it wouldn't work with the SC, that idea was left far behind. 2. I ran the NOS twice. Once just after setting it up and once down the track for a shake down run. It was running lean according to the EGT, so it came back off until I could do a fuel system upgrade which never happened until I got the SC kit. Sold the NOS for a little more money towards the SC. My every day driving was always very blah with very little action. I had only a couple of races after the SC, only to third gear... To tell the truth, SZ01 was the first time I knew the speed limiter was off with the Vortech superchip. I strongly agree with the oil system upgrades for sustained high RPM running... Oh and BTW, it was 130+ MPH, not 120 
Brad Noon '99 SE MTX 3 point oh my God H.O. 179HP/178TQ BNMotorsports Floormats, powder coating, TB optimizing, Gutted cats, etc BNMotorsports is now the preferred distributor of Contour/SVT/Mystique Indiglo style gauges!!!bnmotorsports@msn.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585 |
Originally posted by bnoon: My every day driving was always very blah with very little action. I had only a couple of races after the SC, only to third gear... To tell the truth, SZ01 was the first time I knew the speed limiter was off with the Vortech superchip. I strongly agree with the oil system upgrades for sustained high RPM running... Oh and BTW, it was 130+ MPH, not 120  The only correlation I see to Brad having the SC and his breakdown, was that the SC allowed him to reach 130+mph very easily, at very high engine speeds.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 163
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 163 |
I will tell you what I think is absolutley stupid about this post. That if vortech had never built a supercharger for our car we would all be pissing and whining about why the hell won't they make one for us.Don't install these parts if your going to b!tch about it when something goes wrong there is always the possibility with any modification to a stock motor.
2001 MAXIMA ANNIVERSARY 5 SPEED, VISCOUS LSD K&N DROP IN SS CATTMAN YPIPE 5-ZIGEN HEIDFELDS 17X7.5 GOODYEAR HP ULTRA 245/45/17 THE BELOVED ONE MAYBELINE R.I.P. 2000 2000 SVT TRED #509 OF A BUILD OF 2150
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,794
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,794 |
Brad, I had thought you put the UDP on, my bad. No I do not think th SC will kill a car as quick as yours died. They do put more wear and tear on the engine but as I said before 350hp is not a bad number from a stock D-engine.
Just call me Judge. People suck. Life begins at 170mph...until that point it is just boring.....
|
|
|
|
|