Originally posted by 99blacksesport:So now we come to the past 1-2 years, people calling for Bush to resign as president because we have had "no proof" of the WMDs, as our searches of Iraq were not going well. People today want the smoking gun evidence that we will never be able to provide. All we are most likey going to be able to do is say, here is all of this evidence. By themselves they don't ammount to much, but together they clearly show both a history of creating WMDs of all types, and evidence that it had not been stopped.
At the risk of beating a dead horse, I'll repeat that evidence uncovered now doesn't change what was presented last year. Many people think the evidence originally presented was inadequate; finding and eliminating a stockpile now would be great, but doesn't excuse a Machiavellian invasion based on inadequate evidence.
Not necessarily my opinion, but just pointing this out so we can better understand the intracacies of the situation.
