Yes, I do think that this, combined with all that we know about what was going on over there is more than enough proof that Saddam had weapons and would have no problem selling them to someone who could get them over to the U.S. The technology to get them here is a suitcase on an airline, and an aerosol can. I definately think they had enough technology to do it. Hell, they took down ther World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and yet another flight in PA; all this with box cutters.
Iraq was a safe harbor for terrorists, and they certainly would help in any way. Even without the new evidence found, we had more than enough proof to invade and remove him. If you want to use your logic for staying out of Iraq, we should have also stayed out of Europe in WWII; afterall, it was Japan that attacked us right?
And yes, I do take personal attacks personally. When someone with a head bigger than he can hold comes on here and calls me stupid, tells me I can't formulate an argument, calls every one of my opinions uninformed, and is just all around an as$hole to me, I will call them that. In none of my posts before these attacks were launched at me did I ever say he was an idiot. I don't need to defend my intelligence against anyone, especiallt someone like that, but don't call me stupid and expect me to not take it personally.
The debate was never personal until the attacks on my intelligence began. Everything I have ever said was directed at anyone who opposed the war with the reasoning being that we had no proof. -Nick
