Originally posted by 99blacksesport: I wasn't attempting to answer your question, if you couldn't tell. I took everything that I have read from you on here, coupled with you acting like a know-it-all, and came to the conclusion that you are an a$shole. So simple even you could understand it.
You're right. Its much easier to call someone an [censored] then actually answer his question.
Seriously Nick, you've got to take a step back, take a breath, and come back when you're a little calmer about it. I've enjoyed following and participating in these debates. But when you start with personal attacks, it really reflects significantly worse on you than your intended target.
Originally posted by 99blacksesport:As for the rest of what you say, it's pointless to even respond to you, as like I said, the burden of proof for you and many others will likely never be met.
Are you kidding me! Is this really enough proof for you? I sure hope not! Please tell me it will take a little more than a couple of shells to prove they had WMD before we invaded. I don't think you'll here anyone deny that they were capable of having WMD, or that they had and used WMD on their own people. However, were they a threat to us? Did they have the technology to reach us? That's still unclear.
Nick, try and keep the debate a little less personal. Show some restraint with the name calling man. It really only makes you look like that ass. Debate is healthy and a learning process. Lets keep it on the issues and work from there. Take the little jabs with a grain of salt dude.
- Zack
WANTED: T-Red HEATED Side Mirrors
FOR SALE: 4 14" Alum Alloys and Nearly New Avid H4s Tires w/ Center Caps
2000 T-Red SVT
1995 LX V6 MTX (RIP)
