Originally posted by 99blacksesport:

People, take the blinders off already. Saddam was a danger to his people, the world, and most importantly the U.S.! His hatred of us has no limits, and he would do anything he could to get at us. How long were we going to wait? Should we have waited until he developed an ICBM that could reach the U.S.? Should we wait until we saw the smoke comming from the bunker the ICBM was being launched out of? Or should we have waited until the missle hit us, and he took responsibility for it (because we all know even that wouldn't be enough evidence for some people)?





Oh good lord...using your "logic", we should have invaded North Korea (who, BTW, has already tested and developed long range missles, and could acquire both nuclear capability and inter-continental capability a lot quicker than Iraq) a long time ago. Ask any Defense Specialist or Military Analyst on who's the bigger threat between the 2..and then ask them for some time-lines on possible offensive actions between the two, and I think you'll find that NK wins that little debate by a large margarin.

T-red E0 SVT ATS 17x7.5 Comp Lites, 215/45/17 Falken 512s, Ausi Bar, Boxed subframe, Poli all around, Warmonger's Opt Y, Opt TB, AFE, DMD, NGK's, Bendix Ti, Alpine, Polk, Mobil-1 0W-40, Redline MTL.